SNAPShots

SNAPShots

Medicaid Work Requirements

Both Congress and a number of states have discussed introducing work requirements into their Medicaid programs.  Such a proposal was part of the American Health Care Act, a number of governors and state legislators have discussed work requirements as a condition of Medicaid eligibility, and some states are reportedly considering including such requirements in section 1115 Medicaid waiver applications.
In a new report, the Congressional Research Service examines the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ authority to grant such waivers and how courts might look at such requirements if they were be contested.
Go here to see the Congressional Research Service report “Judicial Review of Medicaid Work Requirements Under Section 1115 Demonstrations.”

2017-04-21T06:00:50+00:00April 21st, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues|Comments Off on Medicaid Work Requirements

New MACPAC Reports

The Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission has released several new reports, including:

  • a look at how states exercise flexibility in their individual Medicaid programs;
  • methodologies for setting Medicaid per capita caps;
  • a review of how states are addressing high-cost hepatitis C drugs in their Medicaid programs;
  • an analysis of Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payment (Medicaid DSH) allotments and payments; and
  • an analysis of when states will exhaust their CHIP allotments.

MACPAC is a non-partisan legislative branch agency that advises Congress, the states, and the administration on Medicaid and CHIP payment and access issues.
Find links to these and other MACPAC reports here, on the MACPAC web site.

2017-04-18T06:00:00+00:00April 18th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues|Comments Off on New MACPAC Reports

Medicaid Per Capita Caps Explained

In a new report, the Commonwealth Fund looks at Medicaid per capita caps, an idea that has been discussed for years, that was part of the as-yet unsuccessful American Health Care Act, and a proposal that is almost certain to resurface in the near future.
Among other things, the article

  • explains what per capita caps are and how they would work
  • describes how per capita caps differ from current Medicaid policy
  • considers how the implementation of per capita caps might affect low-income people, providers, and insurers

Learn more in the Commonwealth Fund article “Essential Facts About Health Reform Alternatives: Medicaid Per Capita Caps,” which can be found here.

2017-04-17T09:56:53+00:00April 17th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Uncategorized|Comments Off on Medicaid Per Capita Caps Explained

To Require Work or Not to Require Work

That is the question policy-makers are asking as they consider imposing work requirements on healthy Medicaid participants.
In recent years a number of states have attempted to establish such a requirement, only to have their requests to do so rejected by regulators in Washington, and a clause permitting states to establish such a requirement was included last month in the eventually sidetracked American Health Care Act.  Even now, a Kentucky Medicaid waiver application under consideration by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services includes a work requirement.
Does the lack of a work requirement encourage people in Medicaid expansion states to withdraw from the workforce?
Is a work requirement a way to raise the income of beneficiaries just enough to cost them their Medicaid eligibility?
Are there jobs available for beneficiaries if such a requirement were to be imposed?
And aren’t many able-bodied Medicaid beneficiaries already working?
This issue is of particular interest to Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals because they serve such large numbers of Medicaid patients.
The Urban Institute looks at these and other Medicaid work-related issues in the new paper “Rationale for Medicaid work requirements not supported by evidence.”  Find that paper here.

2017-04-05T06:00:54+00:00April 5th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on To Require Work or Not to Require Work

CMS Clarifies Medicaid DSH Rule

Last week the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced a final rule addressing the treatment of third-party payers in calculating Medicaid uncompensated care costs.  This calculation affects individual hospitals’ Medicaid disproportionate share (Medicaid DSH) limit.
According to CMS,

This rule clarifies federal requirements regarding the treatment of third party payers in determining the hospital-specific Medicaid DSH payment limit, which is set by statute as a hospital’s “uncompensated costs” incurred in providing hospital services to Medicaid and uninsured patients.

The final rule makes clearer our existing policy that uncompensated costs include only those costs for Medicaid eligible individuals that remain after accounting for all payments received by or on behalf of Medicaid eligible individuals, including Medicare and other third party payments. This is consistent with the statutory requirements governing Medicaid DSH and applicable limits.

All Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals receive Medicaid DSH payments.
See the full rule here.

2017-04-04T06:00:05+00:00April 4th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on CMS Clarifies Medicaid DSH Rule

Temporarily Gone But Not Forgotten

While last week’s withdrawal of the American Health Care Act at least temporarily halted talk of immediate repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act, at least one aspect of that proposed legislation, often discussed in the past, is sure to arise in the future as well:  replacing the current manner in which the federal government matches state Medicaid funding with Medicaid per capita limits or Medicaid block grants.
In a new issue brief, the Kaiser Family Foundation examines how a switch to per capita limits or block grants might affect low-income seniors served by both Medicare and Medicaid.  Among the issues the brief addresses are:

  • why such a switch would matter to low-income seniors at all
  • how it might change federal funding of Medicaid for low-income seniors
  • how states might react in ways that would affect low-income seniors
  • how it might affect the providers who serve low-income seniors
  • how such an approach might vary from state to state

Any move to Medicaid per capita limits or block grants could have serious implications for Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals and the communities they serve because these hospitals serve so many dually eligible Medicare/Medicaid patients.
Learn more about a possible change in how the federal government pays for its share of the Medicaid program that will surely find its way into future health policy discussions and debates in the Kaiser Family Foundation issue brief “What Could a Medicaid Per Capita Cap Mean for Low-Income People on Medicare?”

2017-03-31T06:00:22+00:00March 31st, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on Temporarily Gone But Not Forgotten

CMS Shares Evaluation of Medicare-Medicaid Financial Alignment Efforts

In 2011 the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services launched a “Medicare-Medicaid Financial Alignment Initiative” that seeks “…to provide Medicare-Medicaid enrollees with a better care experience and to better align the financial incentives of the Medicare and Medicaid programs.”
How is that initiative working so far?  CMS recently released three reports that evaluate different aspects of the program.  Those reports are:

Pennsylvania’s private safety-net hospitals serve especially large numbers of dually eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, so such programs are always of special interest to them.
In addition to viewing the reports, go here to learn more about the Medicare-Medicaid Financial Alignment Initiative.

2017-03-29T06:00:43+00:00March 29th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Medicare, Uncategorized|Comments Off on CMS Shares Evaluation of Medicare-Medicaid Financial Alignment Efforts

MACPAC Looks at Medicaid DSH

Hospitals that serve especially large numbers of Medicaid and low-income patients still need Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments (Medicaid DSH) to avoid red ink despite the expansion of Medicaid and the increase in the number of uninsured people fostered by the Affordable Care Act.
So concludes the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) the non-partisan legislative branch agency that advises Congress, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the states on Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program issues.
In its March 2017 report to Congress, MACPAC writes that

In both expansion and non-expansion states, deemed DSH hospitals, which are statutorily required to receive DSH payments because they serve a high share of Medicaid-enrolled and low-income patients, continue to report negative operating margins before DSH payments.

This finding reflects the experience of Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, most of which consider Medicaid DSH to be absolutely critical to their financial health and continued ability to serve their communities.

Learn more about this evaluation, and other facets of the Medicaid DSH program, in this March 2017 report from MACPAC to Congress.  Find a summary of the report here.

2017-03-24T06:00:43+00:00March 24th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Medicaid supplemental payments|Comments Off on MACPAC Looks at Medicaid DSH

MACPAC Meets, Discusses Medicaid Issues

Members of the non-partisan legislative branch agency that advises Congress, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the states on Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program matters met in Washington recently to discuss a number of issues.
On the agenda of the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission were the following issues:

  • state Medicaid flexibility
  • state Medicaid responses to fiscal pressures
  • a study requested by Congress on mandatory and optional benefits and populations
  • current Medicaid parallels to per capita financing options
  • illustrations of state-level effects of per capita cap design elements
  • high-cost hepatitis C drugs
  • the role of section 1915(b) waivers in Medicaid managed care

Because Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals serve so many Medicaid and CHIP participants, MACPAC’s deliberations are especially important and relevant to them.
Go here for a link to overviews of these issues and the presentations offered at the MACPAC meeting.

2017-03-23T06:00:24+00:00March 23rd, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, Uncategorized|Comments Off on MACPAC Meets, Discusses Medicaid Issues

MACPAC Meets, Discusses Medicaid, CHIP Issues

The non-partisan legislative branch agency that advises Congress, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the states on a variety of Medicaid and State Children’s Health Insurance Program issues met last week in Washington, D.C.
Among the issues on the agenda of the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission were:

  • the flexibility of states in structuring and administering their Medicaid and CHIP programs
  • state Medicaid responses to fiscal pressures
  • studies requested by Congress on mandatory/optional benefits and populations
  • current Medicaid parallels to per capita financing options
  • illustrations of state-level effects of per capita cap design elements
  • high-cost hepatitis C drugs in Medicaid
  • the role of section 1915(b) waivers in Medicaid managed care

Because Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals serve so many low-income Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries, MACPAC’s deliberations are often very important to them.
Go here, to the MACPAC web site, for links to documents on all of these subjects.
 

2017-03-09T06:00:59+00:00March 9th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues|Comments Off on MACPAC Meets, Discusses Medicaid, CHIP Issues
Go to Top