Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals Archives - Page 10 of 22 - Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania

Governor Proposes FY 2018 Budget

On Tuesday Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf unveiled his proposed FY 2018 budget to the state’s General Assembly.
This budget proposal includes a number of provisions with potential implications for Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals.
The Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania has prepared a detailed review of those provisions. Officials of safety-net hospitals who would like to receive a copy of this memo may request one by using the “contact us” link on the upper right-hand corner of this screen.
Find a news release from the governor’s office that outlines the proposed budget here and go here (scroll to the bottom of the screen) for links to budget overviews, the entire budget itself, the Wolf administration’s presentation on its plan to consolidate Pennsylvania’s Department of Human Services, Department of Health, Department of Aging, and Department of Drug and Alcohol Services into a single new Department of Health and Human Services, and other related materials.

PA Safety Net Admin2017-02-10T06:00:00+00:00February 10th, 2017|Pennsylvania Medicaid, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy, Pennsylvania Medical Assistance, Pennsylvania proposed FY 2018 budget|Comments Off

Implications of ACA Repeal for Medicaid

How might repeal of the Affordable Care Act affect Medicaid?
Medicaid beneficiaries?
States and providers?
Because they care for so many Medicaid patients, including many who enrolled in Medicaid as a result of the Affordable Care Act, the answers to these questions are of special importance to Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals.
These issues and more are considered in the new Commonwealth Fund report “Medicaid’s Future: What Might ACA Repeal Mean?” Find it here.

PA Safety Net Admin2017-01-19T06:00:04+00:00January 19th, 2017|Affordable Care Act|Comments Off

Academies Completes Work on Social Risk Factors in Health Care

Completing its assignment from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Health and Medicine Division of the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine has published its fifth and final report on social risk factors that affect health outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries and how to account for those risk factors in Medicare payments.
Among other things, the report notes that

Although VBP [value-based purchasing] programs have catalyzed health care providers and plans to address social risk factors in health care delivery through their focus on improving health care outcomes and controlling costs, the role of social risk factors in producing health care outcomes is generally not reflected in payment under current VBP design. This misalignment has led to concerns that trends toward VBP could harm socially at-risk populations: Providers disproportionately serving socially at-risk populations are more likely to score poorly on performance/quality rankings, more likely to be penalized financially, and less likely to receive bonus payments under VBP. VBP may be taking resources from the organizations that need them the most.

The risk factors the Academies considered were socioeconomic position; race, ethnicity, and cultural context; gender; social relationships; and residential and community context.
The Academies’ fifth and final report brings together its first four efforts.

The first report, Accounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment Programs: Identifying Social Risk Factors, presented a conceptual framework and the results of a literature search linking social risk factors to health-related measures.
The second report, System Practices for the Care of Socially At-Risk Populations, explored six patient-centered systems practices that show potential for improving care for socially at-risk communities.
The third report, Accounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment: Criteria, Factors, and Methods, offered guidance on social risk factors might be incorporated into future Medicare payment systems.
The fourth report, Accounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment: Data, offered data strategies and solutions for collecting data to measure social risk factors that might be addressed in future Medicare payment systems.

The fifth and final report, Accounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment, offers additional thoughts and recommendations for next steps.
The subject of socio-economic risk adjustment is of interest to Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals because so many of the patients they serve present with such risk factors.
Find the new report here.

PA Safety Net Admin2017-01-13T06:00:16+00:00January 13th, 2017|Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, Uncategorized|Comments Off

Medicare Program Biased Against Selected Hospitals

Medicare’s hospital-acquired conditions program unfairly penalizes large, large urban, and teaching hospitals, according to a new study.
According to “Complication Rates, Hospital Size, and Bias in the CMS Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program,” published recently in the American Journal of Medical Quality, the hospital-acquired conditions program, which last year penalized nearly 800 hospitals, disproportionately penalizes large, large urban, and teaching hospitals because its threshold for identifying poor-performing hospitals is too broad, it relies on results that in many cases are not statistically different, and it fails to recognize when hospital performance improves.
To correct these biases, the study’s authors recommend adding risk-adjustment components, such as hospital size, to identify poor performers.
Many of Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals are large and have teaching programs.
Learn more about the study, its findings, and its recommendation in this Fierce Healthcare article or go here to read the study on the web site of the American Journal of Medical Quality.

PA Safety Net Admin2016-12-29T06:00:36+00:00December 29th, 2016|Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off

Federal Medicaid Per Capita Spending Limits?

As they have in the past, some members of Congress have suggested of late that Medicaid might benefit from being transformed into a program with limited spending per capita: that is, such an approach would limit the amount of money the federal government would provide to states on a per capita basis.
Such an approach would almost certainly have serious implications for Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals.
What issues would need to be addressed to develop such an approach? What data would be needed?
Earlier this year the chairmen of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Committee asked the U.S. Government Accountability Office to answer these and other questions. Now, the GAO has published its answers in a new report titled Key Policy and Data Considerations for Designing a Per Capita Cap on Federal Funding. Find that report here.

PA Safety Net Admin2016-09-16T06:00:12+00:00September 16th, 2016|Pennsylvania Medicaid laws and regulations, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off

SNAP Comments on Proposed Medicaid DSH Regulation

The Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania has written to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to object to how the agency proposes changing its methodology for calculating eligible hospitals’ Medicaid disproportionate share (Medicaid DSH) payments.
In particular, SNAP opposes the manner in which CMS would treat payments from Medicare and third-party payers made on behalf of Medicaid-eligible individuals.
In SNAP’s view, the letter notes,

…the hospital-specific DSH limit has come to penalize the very hospitals that Medicaid DSH payments were designed to support.

The SNAP letter explains that

What concerns SNAP at this time is CMS’s apparent decision to rationalize and codify in regulations a narrower interpretation of the Medicaid DSH limit than what Congress described in section 1923(g) of the Social Security Act.

Read SNAP’s complete letter here.

PA Safety Net Admin2016-09-15T06:00:48+00:00September 15th, 2016|Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania|Comments Off

NIH Launches Research on Health Disparities in Disadvantaged Communities

The National Institutes of Health is launching a new Transdisciplinary Collaboratives Centers for Health Disparities Research on Chronic Disease Prevention program that seeks to respond to

…the need for more robust, ecological approaches to address chronic diseases among racial and ethnic minority groups, under-served rural populations, people of less privileged socio-economic status, along with groups subject to discrimination who have poorer health outcomes often attributed to being socially disadvantaged. Two centers will focus their research efforts on development, implementation, and dissemination of community-based, multilevel interventions to combat chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer and diabetes.

Anticipated funding over the first five years of the program is approximately $20 million.
In announcing the program, the NIH noted that

Heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes, and arthritis are among the most common, costly and preventable of all health problems. Many of these conditions disproportionately affect health disparity populations and in advanced stages can lead to significant limitations in activities of daily living.

These are the very health challenges that Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals tackle regularly – and far more often than the typical community hospital.
To learn more about what the program seeks to accomplish and the health challenges it anticipates addressing, see this NIH news release.

PA Safety Net Admin2016-09-02T06:00:16+00:00September 2nd, 2016|Uncategorized|Comments Off

CMS Proposes Medicaid DSH Rule

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has proposed a new rule that would clarify the basis for eligible hospitals’ Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments (Medicaid DSH).
Individual hospitals’ Medicaid DSH payments are based on their uncompensated care costs and the rule clarifies that only uncompensated costs for Medicaid patients for whom hospitals receive no other payments, such as from Medicare, state or local governments, or third-party payers, would count toward their hospital-specific Medicaid DSH limit.
See the rule here. Interested parties have until September 15, 2016 to submit formal comments to CMS about its proposal.
Representatives of Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals who would like to know more about how this proposal might affect their hospital can use the “contact us” link on this screen to seek further information.

PA Safety Net Admin2016-08-25T06:00:21+00:00August 25th, 2016|Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off

Docs Less Likely to Participate in ACOs in Disadvantaged Communities

A new study has found that physicians who practice in areas with higher proportions of low-income, uninsured, less-educated, disabled, and African-American residents are less likely than others to participate in accountable care organizations.
If ACOs ultimately are found to improve health care quality while better managing costs, their benefits might be limited in such communities, thereby exacerbating health care disparities. If this trend holds true in Pennsylvania, it could be harmful to many of the communities served by the state’s safety-net hospitals.
To learn more, go here to see the Health Affairs report “Physicians’ Participation In ACOs Is Lower In Places With Vulnerable Populations Than In More Affluent Communities.”

PA Safety Net Admin2016-08-23T10:41:08+00:00August 23rd, 2016|Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, Uncategorized|Comments Off

Medicare Readmissions Penalties Rise

Medicare will impose more than $500 million in penalties in FY 2017 on hospitals that readmit too many Medicare patients within 30 days of their discharge from the hospital.
The penalties, part of Medicare’s hospital readmissions reduction program, represent a 20 percent increase over the penalties the program levied in FY 2016.
Under the program, most (but not all) hospitals are evaluated on their performance with patients with six medical conditions: heart attacks, heart failure, chronic lung disease, hip and knee replacement, and the need for coronary bypass surgery. The maximum penalty is three percent of hospitals’ Medicare payments and the average penalty in FY 2017 will be 0.73 percent – up from 0.61 percent in FY 2016.
The program is widely credited with driving a national reduction in the number of Medicare patients readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge, although as the program’s FY 2017 penalties suggest, reducing those readmissions is proving a considerable challenge for some hospitals.
Ever since the program’s introduction, critics have maintained that hospitals that serve large numbers of low-income patients are treated unfairly by the program. Such patients, a growing body of research has found, are more difficult to treat and more likely to lack the financial, social, and family supports needed to recover from illnesses and injuries without requiring a return to the hospital. Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals serve especially large numbers of such patients.
Learn more about how the readmissions reduction program works and how it will treating hospitals in FY 2017 in this Kaiser Health News report.

PA Safety Net Admin2016-08-11T06:00:36+00:00August 11th, 2016|Uncategorized|Comments Off

SNAPShots

SNAPShots

Home / About Us / Advocacy / Why Join? / SNAPShots / Contact Us

Home / About Us / Advocacy / Why Join? / SNAPShots / Contact Us