SNAPShots

SNAPShots

“Medicaid Shortfall” Definition Changing?

The Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission last week discussed possible changes in how “Medicaid shortfall” is defined for the purpose of determining how much Medicaid disproportionate share money (Medicaid DSH) safety-net hospitals should receive.

The discussion came in the wake of a court decision last year that ruled that third-party payments toward Medicaid-covered services could not be included in hospitals’ Medicaid shortfall calculations.

MACPAC commissioners discussed several statutory changes that would seek to minimize the impact of the court ruling:

  • Include third-party payments in the definition of Medicaid shortfall.
  • Exclude from the Medicaid DSH definition of Medicaid shortfall all payments and costs for patients who have third-party coverage.
  • Explore new rules that address different types of third-party coverage.

MACPAC is an advisory body whose recommendations to Congress are not binding but its views are respected and often find their way into future public policy.

This subject is important to Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals because all of them receive Medicaid DSH payments.

Learn more about MACPAC’s deliberations on Medicaid shortfalls and Medicaid DSH from the Fierce Healthcare article “MACPAC considers recommending change to definition of ‘Medicaid shortfall’ at safety net hospitals.”

 

2019-03-13T06:00:58+00:00March 13th, 2019|DSH hospitals, Federal Medicaid issues, Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on “Medicaid Shortfall” Definition Changing?

MACPAC: Slow Medicaid DSH Cuts

Slow the pace of scheduled cuts in Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments (Medicaid DSH), the non-partisan agency that advises Congress and the administration will tell Congress in its next report of policy recommendations.

The Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission voted 16-1 recently to recommend to Congress that Medicaid DSH cuts, mandated by the Affordable Care Act but delayed three times by Congress, be reduced in size and spread out over a longer period of time.

Currently, Medicaid DSH allotments to the states are scheduled to be reduced $4 billion in FY 2020 and then $8 billion a year in FY 2021 through FY 2025.  MACPAC recommends that the cuts be reduced to $2 billion in FY 2020, $4 billion in FY 2021, $6 billion in FY 2022, and $8 billion a year from FY 2023 through FY 2029.

MACPAC commissioners also voted to urge Congress to restructure the manner in which Medicaid DSH allotments to the states are calculated based on the number of low-income individuals who reside in the states.

Most Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals receive Medicaid DSH payments and consider them a vital resource in helping to underwrite the uncompensated care they provide to uninsured patients.

MACPAC is a non-partisan legislative branch agency that provides policy and data analysis and makes recommendations to Congress, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the states on a wide array of issues affecting Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

Learn more about MACPAC’s actions on Medicaid DSH in the Fierce Healthcare article “MACPAC calls for Congress to delay cuts to safety-net hospitals.”

2019-02-04T06:00:11+00:00February 4th, 2019|Affordable Care Act, DSH hospitals, Federal Medicaid issues, Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on MACPAC: Slow Medicaid DSH Cuts

MACPAC Meets

The Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission met for two days last week in Washington, D.C.

The following is MACPAC’s own summary of the sessions.

Hospital payment was a key focus of MACPAC’s January meeting with the Commission voting on Thursday to approve two sets of recommendations, the first addressing the structure of disproportionate share hospital (DSH) allotment reductions and the second directed to improving compliance with upper payment limit requirements. Both sets of recommendations are slated for inclusion in MACPAC’s March 2019 Report to Congress on Medicaid and CHIP.

Later that morning, the Commission discussed a study on performance and return on investment for state program integrity strategies. This session was originally scheduled for the December meeting. Following a break for lunch, the Commission was briefed on a new report by Mathematica Policy Research, under contract to MACPAC, regarding beneficiary enrollment in the Financial Alignment Initiative, which is testing new approaches to integrating care for people who are dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare. Later, staff presented an analysis of the factors affecting physician decisions to accept new Medicaid patients.

Friday’s sessions opened with a panel of experts discussing how utilization management policies are applied to medication-assisted treatment (MAT). Under the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (P.L. 115-271), MACPAC is required to study utilization management policies related to MAT and report on these by late October 2019. The meeting concluded with its third and final session on hospital payment: how to account for third-party payments in the DSH definition of Medicaid shortfall.

Supporting the commissioners’ deliberations were the following presentations prepared by MACPAC staff.

  1. Improving the Structure of Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotment Reductions: Review of Chapter and Recommendation Drafts for the March 2019 Report
  2. Upper Payment Limit Compliance: Review of Draft Recommendations in the March 2019 Report
  3. Measuring Performance and Return on Investment for Program Integrity Strategies
  4. Factors Affecting Beneficiary Enrollment in the Financial Alignment Initiative
  5. Physician Acceptance of New Medicaid Patients: New Findings
  6. Utilization Management of Medication-Assisted Treatment
  7. Accounting for Third-Party Payments in the Disproportionate Share Hospital Definition of Medicaid Shortfall

Because SNAP members serve so many Medicaid patients, MACPAC’s deliberations are especially relevant to them because its recommendations often find their way into future Medicaid and CHIP policies.

MACPAC is a non-partisan legislative branch agency that provides policy and data analysis and makes recommendations to Congress, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the states on a wide array of issues affecting Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

2019-01-29T06:00:09+00:00January 29th, 2019|DSH hospitals, Federal Medicaid issues, Medicaid supplemental payments|Comments Off on MACPAC Meets

The Continued Need for Medicaid DSH

While the Affordable Care Act has greatly increased the number of Americans with health insurance and reduced the demand for uncompensated care from hospitals, many hospitals still see significant numbers of uninsured patients.
Some of those patients simply have not taken advantage of the health reform law’s creation of easier access to affordable insurance while others live in states that have not expanded their Medicaid programs.
Hospitals that care for especially large numbers of such uninsured patients qualify for Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments, commonly referred to as Medicaid DSH.  The purpose of these payments is to help these hospitals with the unreimbursed costs they incur caring for such patients.
The Affordable Care Act calls for reducing Medicaid DSH payments to hospitals.  Many hospitals and hospital groups oppose this cut and are asking Congress to block its implementation.  Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals benefit considerably from Medicaid DSH payments.
The Commonwealth Fund recently published a commentary calling for delaying scheduled Medicaid DSH cuts.  Go here to see the article “Keep Harmful Cuts in Federal Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments at Bay.”

2017-12-27T06:00:23+00:00December 27th, 2017|Affordable Care Act, Federal Medicaid issues, Medicaid supplemental payments|Comments Off on The Continued Need for Medicaid DSH

SNAP Writes to House Ways and Means Committee About Medicaid DSH Audits

The federal government should give states the option of monitoring Medicaid disproportionate share payments (Medicaid DSH) to hospitals through prospective DSH limit calculations rather than through retroactive DSH audits.

Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania logoSNAP recently shared this view with the House Ways and Means Committee’s Health Subcommittee in response to that subcommittee’s request for suggestions from stakeholders on ways to improve the delivery of Medicare services and eliminate statutory and regulatory obstacles to more effective care delivery.

 According to SNAP, retroactive DSH audits are cumbersome, burdensome, and expensive, give rise to many disputes and appeals, and in the end yield results very similar to much simpler prospective DSH limit calculations performed by the very state governments that distribute Medicaid DSH funds.

 See SNAP’s comments to the Ways and Means Committee here.

2017-08-29T17:00:02+00:00August 29th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania, Uncategorized|Comments Off on SNAP Writes to House Ways and Means Committee About Medicaid DSH Audits

New MACPAC Study Evaluates Medicaid, Medicare Payments

Medicaid payments to hospitals are comparable to or even higher than Medicare payments.
Or at least they are once supplemental Medicaid payments are included.
So concludes a new study by the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission, a non-partisan legislative branch agency that advises the states, Congress, and the administration on Medicaid and CHIP payment and access issues.
In what MACPAC bills as the “first-ever study to construct a state-level payment index to compare fee-for-service inpatient hospital payments across states and to benchmark Medicaid payments to other payers such as Medicare,” the study found that

  • Across states, base Medicaid payment for inpatient services varies considerably, ranging from 49 percent to 169 percent of the national average. This variation is similar to the variation across states previously reported for physician fees.
  • States are not consistently high or low payers across all inpatient services due to differences in their payment policies.
  • Payment amounts for the same service can also vary within a state.

The MACPAC analysis also concluded that

  • Overall, Medicaid payment is comparable or higher than Medicare.
  • Specifically, the average Medicaid payment for 18 selected conditions was 6 percent higher than Medicare, and the average Medicaid payment for all but two of the conditions was higher than Medicare.
  • The average Medicaid payment for these 18 services was higher than Medicare in 25 states and lower than Medicare in 22 states.

Learn more about what MACPAC found – and how Pennsylvania Medicaid payments stack up – in the new MACPAC report “Medicaid Hospital Payment: A Comparison across States and to Medicare,” which can be found here, on MACPAC’s web site.

2017-04-14T06:00:19+00:00April 14th, 2017|Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy, Uncategorized|Comments Off on New MACPAC Study Evaluates Medicaid, Medicare Payments

CMS Clarifies Medicaid DSH Rule

Last week the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced a final rule addressing the treatment of third-party payers in calculating Medicaid uncompensated care costs.  This calculation affects individual hospitals’ Medicaid disproportionate share (Medicaid DSH) limit.
According to CMS,

This rule clarifies federal requirements regarding the treatment of third party payers in determining the hospital-specific Medicaid DSH payment limit, which is set by statute as a hospital’s “uncompensated costs” incurred in providing hospital services to Medicaid and uninsured patients.

The final rule makes clearer our existing policy that uncompensated costs include only those costs for Medicaid eligible individuals that remain after accounting for all payments received by or on behalf of Medicaid eligible individuals, including Medicare and other third party payments. This is consistent with the statutory requirements governing Medicaid DSH and applicable limits.

All Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals receive Medicaid DSH payments.
See the full rule here.

2017-04-04T06:00:05+00:00April 4th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on CMS Clarifies Medicaid DSH Rule

MACPAC Looks at Medicaid DSH

Hospitals that serve especially large numbers of Medicaid and low-income patients still need Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments (Medicaid DSH) to avoid red ink despite the expansion of Medicaid and the increase in the number of uninsured people fostered by the Affordable Care Act.
So concludes the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) the non-partisan legislative branch agency that advises Congress, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the states on Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program issues.
In its March 2017 report to Congress, MACPAC writes that

In both expansion and non-expansion states, deemed DSH hospitals, which are statutorily required to receive DSH payments because they serve a high share of Medicaid-enrolled and low-income patients, continue to report negative operating margins before DSH payments.

This finding reflects the experience of Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, most of which consider Medicaid DSH to be absolutely critical to their financial health and continued ability to serve their communities.

Learn more about this evaluation, and other facets of the Medicaid DSH program, in this March 2017 report from MACPAC to Congress.  Find a summary of the report here.

2017-03-24T06:00:43+00:00March 24th, 2017|Federal Medicaid issues, Medicaid supplemental payments|Comments Off on MACPAC Looks at Medicaid DSH

Integrating Medicaid Supplemental Payments into Value-Based Purchasing

New health care delivery and reimbursement systems and new federal regulations will result in changes in how states deploy their Medicaid resources through supplemental payments in the coming years.
A new Commonwealth Fund report describes the kinds of supplemental Medicaid payments states currently make to hospitals – such as disproportionate share and upper payment limit payments – and notes the differing degree to which individual states use such supplemental payments.
financeIt also describes how those supplemental payments may be restructured in the coming years to foster greater use of value-based purchasing and to reward achieving state-created quality goals through new delivery and reimbursement systems such as accountable care organizations, bundled payments, shared savings program, capitated arrangements, and shared risk.
Such changes have potentially serious implications for Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals – as SNAP members learned first-hand from state Medicaid director Leesa Allen when she met with them in November in Philadelphia to discuss the commonwealth’s plans for value-based purchasing and changes in Medicaid reimbursement.
Learn more about what the future may have in store for Medicaid supplemental payments in the Commonwealth Fund report Integrating Medicaid Supplemental Payments into Value-Based Purchasing.

2016-12-07T06:00:49+00:00December 7th, 2016|Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on Integrating Medicaid Supplemental Payments into Value-Based Purchasing

MACPAC Looks at Medicaid DSH

With Medicaid disproportionate share payments (Medicaid DSH) facing future reductions, the agency charged with advising Congress on Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance payment and access matters is considering what changes the federal supplemental Medicaid payment program might need.
macpacAt a recent meeting in Washington, D.C., the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission discussed the changing role and purpose of Medicaid DSH as more Americans obtain health insurance through private or public sources. MACPAC commissioners noted that hospital uncompensated care is falling, especially in states that have taken advantage of the Affordable Care Act to expand their Medicaid programs.
A new Medicaid DSH formula set to be used for FY 2018, based more heavily than the current formula on the number of uninsured people in individual states, is expected to result in larger-than-average reductions for hospitals in Medicaid expansion states.
Among the steps commissioners discussed were examining how hospitals use their Medicaid DSH funds; considering how any changes in the distribution of Medicaid DSH funds might affect other parts of states’ health care systems; and the role states should play in determining the allocation of Medicaid DSH funds.
Medicaid DSH funds are a vital source of support to help Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals care for their many uninsured patients.
For a closer look at the issue and MACPAC’s deliberations, see this CQ Roll Call article presented by the Commonwealth Fund.

2016-09-26T06:00:26+00:00September 26th, 2016|Affordable Care Act, Medicaid supplemental payments, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on MACPAC Looks at Medicaid DSH
Go to Top