Medicaid Transportation Services in Jeopardy?
The White House has proposed removing non-emergency transportation from the list of mandatory Medicaid benefits.
The proposed FY 2020 budget released last week explained that
Statute allows, but does not require, States to provide non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT). Instead, these services were made mandatory Medicaid benefits by regulation. Further, a Government Accountability Office study found Medicaid NEMT spending totaled $1.5 billion in 2013, and NEMT programs face multiple challenges, including difficulties in obtaining costs and maintaining program integrity. To address these issues, this proposal would update regulations to clarify the NEMT benefit is strictly optional.
Medical transportation has long been viewed as vital means for helping Medicaid patients keep doctors’ appointments and recover from their illnesses and injuries and for overcoming some social determinants of health. Loss of this tool would be harmful for Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals and the patients and communities they serve.
Last week the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission released its annual report to Congress, with most of the report focusing on its analysis and recommendations for policy updates involving Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments (Medicaid DSH) and Medicaid upper payment limit payments (UPL payments).
MACPAC commissioners discussed several statutory changes that would seek to minimize the impact of the court ruling:
According to a Pennsylvania Department of Health news release,
Included in this edition are articles about:
According to a new study published in Health Affairs,
increasing Pennsylvania’s minimum wage
Some are implementing hospital or insurer taxes while others are increasing existing taxes on hospitals and health insurers. New Hampshire is directing part of the proceeds from a liquor tax for this purpose and other states have introduced cigarette taxes. Some are charging premiums to Medicaid beneficiaries and introducing work requirements for their Medicaid population so they can reduce overall enrollment. Many are using money from their general revenues.
Hospitals and health systems spent $99.7 million lobbying in Washington, D.C. last year, just barely more than in 2017 but much less than in 2009, when the focus of health care lobbying was the Affordable Care Act, then just a proposal and not a law.