Health Care Groups Rebel Against Proposed Federal Regulation, Program
The administration’s proposed Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation and its guidance encouraging states to implement Medicaid block grants have incurred widespread opposition among a variety of health care groups.
The Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation would, if adopted, impose new restrictions on how states raise their share of their Medicaid spending, potentially limiting state participation in Medicaid or necessitating tax increases to fill the funding gap if long-accepted financing tools are no longer available to them.
The Medicaid block grant guidance offers states a blueprint for curtailing their Medicaid costs by imposing limits on that spending that they negotiate with the federal government.
Numerous health care groups have expressed reservations or direct opposition to one or both of the proposals. Among them:
- AARP
- America’s Essential Hospitals
- America’s Health Insurance Plans
- American College of Emergency Physicians
- American Health Care Association
- American Hospital Association
- American Medical Association
- Association for Community Affiliated Plans
- Association of American Medical Colleges
- Coalition of Long-Term Acute-Care Hospitals
- LeadingAge
- National Alliance of Safety-Net Hospitals
- National Association of State Budget Officers
- National Association of Medicaid Directors
- National Continuing Care Residents Association
- National Governors Association
- Private Essential Access Community Hospitals
Among the groups submitting formal comment letters to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in response to the proposed Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation was the Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania. See SNAP’s letter here.
Learn more about why these groups object to these two new policy developments in articles in Axios (“A little-noticed Medicaid proposal could have huge consequences”), Bloomberg Law (“Trump Plan to Tame State Medicaid Finance Schemes Sees Pushback”), Health Affairs (“Proposed Rules On Medicaid Financing Miss Mark And Threaten Access”), Healthcare Dive (“Payers, providers urge CMS to scrap rule targeting supplemental Medicaid payments”), Healthcare Finance News (“Providers, payers, others speak out against federal proposals for Medicaid funding”), McKnight’s Long-Term Care News (“Providers rally against proposed Medicaid supplemental payment rules that threaten ‘major financial burdens’”), McKnight’s Senior Living (“CMS proposal would be ‘major financial burden’ for CCRCs, residents, organizations say”), and U.S. News & World Report (“Governors Warn Trump Rule Could Lead to Big Medicaid Cuts”)
The proposed budget, presented to the state legislature earlier this week, includes the following new initiatives:
Included in this month’s edition are articles about:
In a news release, Governor Wolf said that
Last August a new Department of Homeland Security regulation took effect that authorized the federal government to reject immigrants’ applications for visas and green cards if their financial situation and employment prospects suggested that they might become a “public charge” and dependent on government safety-net programs like Medicaid and food stamps. A number of groups sued to prevent the rule’s implementation and federal courts imposed an injunction against its enforcement but now the Supreme Court has lifted the last of these injunctions.
For years, county governments ran their own programs, which provided free non-emergency transportation to doctor offices for Medicaid patients. About 55,000 Pennsylvanians served by Medicaid use this program.
In late December, PBS broadcast an interview with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrator Seema Verma. Kaiser Health News has published a transcript of excerpts from that interview during which Verma discusses Medicaid – including enrollment, eligibility, services, and children – Medicare for all, administration attempts to reduce health care costs, protection for people with pre-existing conditions, and more. Read those excerpts in the Kaiser Health News article “
The purpose of the PDL is to save money – an estimated $85 million a year, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.