If Medicaid is a health care program for at-risk low-income people, it appears that Medicaid itself is at risk during the current fiscal cliff talks in Washington, D.C.
While Medicaid was left untouched by last year’s sequestration bill, it is now viewed by growing numbers of policy-makers as a potential source of savings to help stave off the fiscal cliff.
Several aspects of Medicaid, in particular, appear to be vulnerable in the coming weeks.  They include Medicaid provider taxes, which are incurring growing opposition in Washington and which, if ratcheted back, could save more than $25 billion; supplemental payments for Medicaid primary care providers, scheduled to take effect on January 1, which if eliminated would save $13 billion; better management of dual eligibles, which could save $12 billion; and medical equipment spending, where a competitive bidding program similar to that currently being introduced for Medicare could save $5 billion.
While all of these cuts would hurt Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals, those hospitals would particularly be affected by any reduction in either the rate at which the federal government matches the state’s Medicaid expenditures or in its ability to levy provider taxes, which are a key contributor to the financial foundation of the state’s Medicaid program.
Learn more about how Medicaid figures in the current fiscal cliff talks and how policy-makers are increasingly looking to Medicaid for savings in this Politico article.