Medicare Archives - Page 7 of 9 - Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania

Readmissions Down But Observation Status Up

New research suggests that the general decline in hospital readmissions may be leading to increased use of observation status.
According to new research in the journal Health Affairs,

Our independent analysis of Medicare data published by CMS revealed that the top 10 percent of hospitals with the largest drop (16 percent on average) in readmission rates between 2011 and 2012 also increased their use of observation status for Medicare patients returning within 30 days by an average 25 percent over the same time period.

The practice appears to be affecting privately insured patients, too, with the report noting that

…hospitals that reduced readmissions within 30 days also increased their share of returning observation patients in private plans. The top third of hospitals with the largest six-year (2009-2014) reduction in 30 day readmissions (26 percent on average) increased their share of returning observation patients in private plans by an average of 45 percent (Figure 2). Much of that increase started in 2012, the same year that Medicare hospital readmission penalties began.

The report concludes that

Our findings suggest that at least some hospitals are substituting observation status for inpatient readmissions, both for Medicare and privately insured patients. These trends raise a number of questions. For instance, do observation patients get the same quality of care as inpatients? Further, do drops in readmission rates truly mean that hospitals are providing better quality care? Or… is it merely that some hospitals are avoiding penalties by relabeling patients they previously would have readmitted as observation patients?

Learn more about the study, its findings, and its potential implications in the article “Is Observation Status Substituting For Hospital Readmission?” here, on the Health Affairs web site.

PA Safety Net Admin2015-11-11T06:00:09+00:00November 11th, 2015|Medicare|Comments Off

CMS Proposal Would Mandate Hospital Discharge Planning

Hospitals that participate in Medicare and Medicaid would be required to develop discharge plans for all inpatients and many outpatients under a new regulation proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
According to a CMS news release,

…hospitals, including inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term care hospitals, critical access hospitals, and home health agencies would be required to develop a discharge plan based on the goals, preferences, and needs of each applicable patient . Under the proposed rule, hospitals and critical access hospitals would be required to develop a discharge plan within 24 hours of admission or registration and complete a discharge plan before the patient is discharged home or transferred to another facility. This would apply to all inpatients and certain types of outpatients, including patients receiving observation services, patients who are undergoing surgery or other same-day procedures where anesthesia or moderate sedation is used, and emergency department patients who have been identified by a practitioner as needing a discharge plan. In addition, hospitals, critical access hospitals, and home health agencies would have to —

Provide discharge instructions to patients who are discharged home (proposed for hospitals and critical access hospitals only);
Have a medication reconciliation process with the goal of improving patient safety by enhancing medication management (proposed for hospitals and critical access hospitals only);
For patients who are transferred to another facility, send specific medical information to the receiving facility; and
Establish a post-discharge follow-up process (proposed for hospitals and critical access hospitals only).

The proposed regulation stresses the preferences and goals of patients in the development of their discharge plans, including the selection of post-acute-care providers to which they may be discharged or the home health providers that may serve them when they return home.
Significantly, from the perspective of Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals, the proposed regulation calls for hospitals to consider the socio-economic status of the patients for whom they are planning – although no requirements are associated with that status.
Interested parties have until January 3 to submit comments to CMS on the proposed regulation.
To learn more about what CMS is proposing and what it hopes to accomplish, see this CMS news release. Find the proposed regulation itself here.

PA Safety Net Admin2015-11-02T06:00:15+00:00November 2nd, 2015|Medicare|Comments Off

Medicare Cuts May be Part of Budget Deal

The agreement between the White House and congressional negotiators on a two-year budget deal and an increase in the federal debt ceiling will be paid for in part with reductions in Medicare payments.
Under the reported agreement, negotiators agreed to increase federal spending $80 billion over two years, and that increase will almost certainly need to be offset by spending cuts. The New York Times has reported that “The Medicare savings would come from cuts in payments to doctors and other health care providers.”
The budget agreement reportedly did not include specific spending cuts beyond extension of the current two percent Medicare sequestration cuts, although the publication The Hill reports that site-neutral Medicare outpatient payments may be part of the agreement; the additional cuts will need to be negotiated within Congress.
To learn more about the budget agreement and its possible implications for health care providers, see this New York Times article and this report from The Hill.

PA Safety Net Admin2015-10-27T16:31:46+00:00October 27th, 2015|Medicare|Comments Off

Patient-Centered Care Needs Closer Scrutiny, Study Says

While the growing emphasis on patient-centered care has turned from a theory into an active tool in the development of public health care policy, a greater emphasis must be placed on cataloguing and examining more closely those efforts.
Or so says a new study from the Urban Institute.
According to the study, policy-makers need “…a clearer picture of where current policies have already taken us and where they are heading.”
The study also notes that “… efforts in HHS and elsewhere in the federal government should be comprehensively catalogued and subjected to the same strategic scrutiny as other care improvement activities” and that “The pace of change also underlines the need for better measures and more information on effective implementation.”
For a closer look at the study’s findings, go here, to the Urban Institute’s web site, to find the study “The Road to Making Patient-Centered Care Real.”

PA Safety Net Admin2015-10-20T06:00:33+00:00October 20th, 2015|Medicare|Comments Off

Members of Congress Seek Increased Medicare Rates

Members of Congress have written to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) acting administrator Andrew Slavitt asking him to reconsider his agency’s proposal to reduce the rates Medicare will pay providers for outpatient services.
In July, CMS proposed reducing those outpatient rates 0.2 percent in calendar year 2016.
The letter notes that

According to MedPAC, Medicare already pays hospitals less than 88 cents on the dollar for outpatient services and this rule will make that situation worse for our constituents – both hospitals and patients alike.

The letter also states that

Medicare already pays providers less than the cost of care. Prescribing a negative update to OPPS [note: outpatient prospective payment system] payment rates will only make it more difficult for hospitals to serve their patients and their communities, particularly as they move to adopt delivery system reforms.

To see the letter, including the names of the 95 Democrats and Republicans who signed it, go here.

PA Safety Net Admin2015-10-13T06:00:53+00:00October 13th, 2015|Medicare|Comments Off

Study Considers How Best to Prevent Readmissions

A five-year study performed by researchers from the Yale School of Public Health has found that while many hospitals have successfully reduced the rate of readmission for their Medicare patients, few specific strategies have emerged as best practices for tackling this challenge.
In fact, only one strategy appears to be universally effective: discharging patients with their follow-up appointments already made.
Beyond that, researchers found that hospitals lowered their readmission rates by employing a number of tools and that most successful hospitals employed at least three such tools – although which tools they employed differed and more tools did not produce better results.
Hospitals have been working to lower their readmissions in response to Medicare’s hospital readmissions reduction program, which imposes financial penalties for hospitals that readmit “too many” of their Medicare patients.
The study’s conclusion:

Hospital readmission rates result from the confluence of diverse patient, provider, and organizational factors. Despite a wide range of hospitals and five years of study, we found little evidence that specific strategies conferred improvements across hospitals, aside from booking follow-up appointments before discharge. Rather, adopting at least three strategies, tailoring implementation efforts to local circumstances, and persistence over time seemed to be keys to success.

Find the Yale study “National Campaigns to Reduce Readmissions: What Have We Learned?” here, on the web site of the Commonwealth Fund, which underwrote the research.

PA Safety Net Admin2015-10-05T06:00:55+00:00October 5th, 2015|Medicare|Comments Off

Hospitals, Especially Safety-Net Hospitals, Struggle With Heart Failure Readmissions

For all the emphasis on reducing readmissions to hospitals, providers continue to struggle to prevent readmissions of patients suffering heart failure.
Or so concludes a new study published in the Journal of Cardiac Failure.
According to the study, there has been only a slight reduction in readmissions rates for heart failure patients over the past four years.
In addition, Fierce Healthcare reports that

…2014 research revealed that safety-net hospitals and those with largely low-income patient populations are at particular risk for heart failure readmissions; patients from lower-income neighborhoods, researchers found, were nearly 17 percent more likely to be readmitted within six months of discharge.

This finding supports the Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania’s long-time contention that the distinct challenges Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals face in serving their especially low-income, medically challenged communities speak to the need for public policy that reflects those special challenges.
To learn more about this issue, see this Fierce Healthcare report.

PA Safety Net Admin2015-10-02T06:00:12+00:00October 2nd, 2015|Medicare, Uncategorized|Comments Off

Court Rebuffs HHS on Medicare Two-Midnight Rule Pay Cut

A federal court has told the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that it will have to do more to justify a 0.2 percent cut in inpatient payment rates that is part of the controversial Medicare two-midnight rule.
The court decided that in addition to providing a better rationale for the pay cut, Medicare also will need to have a public comment period for that rationale.
Medicare had already delayed implementation of the two-midnight rule.
To learn more about this court decision, see this McKnight Long-Term Care News article.

PA Safety Net Admin2015-09-30T06:00:46+00:00September 30th, 2015|Medicare|Comments Off

Medicare Readmissions Program Unfair to Safety-Net Hospitals, Study Finds

Medicare’s readmissions reduction program penalizes hospitals based largely on the patients they serve rather than their performance serving them, a new study has concluded.
According to the report “Patient Characteristics and Differences in Hospital Readmission Rates,” published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine,

Patient characteristics not included in Medicare’s current risk-adjustment methods explained much of the difference in readmission risk between patients admitted to hospitals with higher vs lower readmission rates. Hospitals with high readmission rates may be penalized to a large extent based on the patients they serve.

Among those two dozen socio-economic factors: patient income, education, and ability to bathe, dress, and feed themselves.
The study found, for example, that the worst-performing hospitals under Medicare’s hospital readmissions reduction program have 50 percent more patients with less than a high school education than the program’s best performers.
Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals serve especially large numbers of low-income patients and have been especially vulnerable to the readmissions reduction program’s penalties.
To learn more about the study, see this Washington Post story. To find the study itself, go here, to the web site of JAMA Internal Medicine.

PA Safety Net Admin2015-09-22T06:00:25+00:00September 22nd, 2015|Medicare|Comments Off

MedPAC Looks at Various Issues at September Public Meeting

The independent federal agency that advises Congress on Medicare payment issues held its monthly public meeting in Washington, D.C.
During the two days of meetings, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) discussed its work on six specific issues:

developing a unified payment system for post-acute care
a preliminary analysis of Medicare Advantage encounter data for Part B services
factors affecting variation in Medicare Advantage plan star ratings
Medicare drug spending
emergency department services provided at stand-alone facilities
payments from drug and device manufacturers to physicians and teaching hospitals

Each discussion was accompanied by an issue brief and a presentation; find those documents here.

PA Safety Net Admin2015-09-16T06:00:54+00:00September 16th, 2015|Medicare|Comments Off

SNAPShots

SNAPShots

Home / About Us / Advocacy / Why Join? / SNAPShots / Contact Us

Home / About Us / Advocacy / Why Join? / SNAPShots / Contact Us