SNAPShots

SNAPShots

Profile of Nominee to Head CMS

President-elect Donald Trump has nominated Seema Verma, a health care consultant, to serve as administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. That agency runs the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
vermaIn this capacity she would have enormous influence on the development of new Medicare and Medicaid initiatives, including many proposals for change from the incoming administration and Congress – all matters of vital concern to Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals.
Go here to see a Kaiser Health News profile of Ms. Verma and learn more about her past work, especially on Medicaid issues.

2016-12-06T06:00:58+00:00December 6th, 2016|Medicare, Pennsylvania Medicaid|Comments Off on Profile of Nominee to Head CMS

New Study Questions 30-Day Readmissions as Measure of Hospital Quality

Hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge may not be a good way of judging the quality of care hospitals provide, a new study suggests.
Seven days may be more like it.
According to a new study published in the journal Health Affairs, the impact of the quality of care a hospital provides appears to be most evident immediately upon patients’ discharge from the hospital.
health affairsFurther, the study suggests,

… most readmissions after the seventh day postdischarge were explained by community- and household-level factors beyond hospitals’ control.

The researchers’ conclusion?

Shorter intervals of seven or fewer days might improve the accuracy and equity of readmissions as a measure of hospital quality for public accountability.

The findings call into question the approach employed by Medicare through its’ hospital readmissions reduction program. Some of the issues the study cites – community and household factors – are the very kinds of challenges that Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals face far more often than the typical community hospital in the state.
To learn more about how the study was performed and what its implications might be, go here to see the Health Affairs study “Rethinking Thirty-Day Hospital Readmissions: Shorter Intervals Might Be Better Indicators Of Quality Of Care.’

2016-10-12T06:00:20+00:00October 12th, 2016|Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on New Study Questions 30-Day Readmissions as Measure of Hospital Quality

Medicare Readmissions Down Almost Everywhere

Hospitals in 49 of the 50 states have reduced their Medicare readmissions since the federal health care program introduced its readmissions reduction program in 2010.
Only hospitals in Vermont have failed to cut readmissions.
Nationally, readmissions fell more than five percent in 43 states and more than ten percent in 11 states. Overall, readmissions fell 100,000 in 2015 alone compared to 2010 and have fallen 565,000 since 2010.
cmsAs the program ages more medical conditions are being subjected to the readmissions reduction program’s requirements. In the coming year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services estimates it will penalize 2500 hospitals $538 million for failing to reduce their readmissions.
Learn more about CMS’s efforts to reduce readmissions among Medicare patients in this entry on the CMS Blog.

2016-09-22T06:00:36+00:00September 22nd, 2016|Medicare, Uncategorized|Comments Off on Medicare Readmissions Down Almost Everywhere

Senate May Tackle Socio-economic Risk Adjustment

With a House bill to adjust Medicare payment penalties based upon the socio-economic challenges posed by the patients some hospitals serve folded into a House bill that passed in June, the Senate may take up this issue during its fall session.
Health economists, policy experts, and providers generally agree that the performance of hospitals that serve especially large numbers of low-income patients is affected in a number of areas, including Medicare readmissions, meeting value-based purchasing criteria, and others.
And while the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services acknowledges the challenge, the agency has rejected calls for risk adjustment so far, repeatedly writing that it does not “want to mask potential disparities or minimize incentives to improve the outcomes of disadvantaged populations.”
HospitalMeanwhile, a growing body of research has documented that the anticipated impact of serving socioeconomically challenged patients is real and more and more people are joining the call for Congress or CMS to address the problem.
Compounding the challenge is that hospitals that serve such patients are faced with growing financial penalties from Medicare if they fail to perform at levels comparable to hospitals that face fewer challenges.
For a closer look at the issue, the arguments on both sides, and the prospects for congressional action this fall, see this article from CQ Roll Call presented by the Commonwealth Fund.

2016-09-20T06:00:19+00:00September 20th, 2016|Medicare|Comments Off on Senate May Tackle Socio-economic Risk Adjustment

There’s More to Quality Than Readmissions, Study Suggests

Hospitals with high readmissions rates may also have lower mortality rates for some conditions, according to a new study.
The study, published in the Journal of Hospital Medicine, found that patients suffering from heart failure, stroke, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are served in hospitals with higher readmission rates have a slightly better chance of survival than if they were treated in hospitals with lower readmission rates.
iStock_000015640638XSmallSuch findings call into question the value of focusing on readmissions as a measure of the quality of care hospitals provide – a focus exemplified by Medicare’s hospital readmissions reduction program.
Find the study “Associations between hospital-wide readmission rates and mortality measures at the hospital level: Are hospital-wide readmissions a measure of quality?” here and find a summary of the study in this article in McKnight’s Long-Term Care News.

2016-09-07T13:00:05+00:00September 7th, 2016|Medicare|Comments Off on There’s More to Quality Than Readmissions, Study Suggests

Hospital Group Models Risk-Adjusted Medicare Readmissions

The Missouri Hospital Association has published data that demonstrates that risk-adjusting Medicare readmissions based on social determinants of health reduces the readmission rates of hospitals that care for large numbers of low-income patients.
The data, modeling, and risk adjustment methodology, developed by the association based on data from Missouri hospitals, published on the association’s “Focus on Hospitals” web site, and described in an article on the NEJM Catalyst web site, showed that

SDS [note:  sociodemographic status)-enriched models yielded significant relative reductions in the range of risk-standardized readmission ratios for each of…6 outcomes…Overall, SDS enrichment best improved the 30-day readmission assessments of hospitals that served higher concentrations of Medicaid patients and higher-poverty communities.

iStock_000005787159XSmallThe lack of risk adjustment for socioeconomic risk factors has been a controversial aspect of Medicare’s hospital readmissions reduction, with a growing body of research suggesting that without such risk adjustment, the program is unfair to hospitals that care for especially large numbers of low-income patients- hospitals like Pennsylvania’s private safety-net hospitals.
Learn more about the work done by the Missouri Hospital Association, and its implications, in its report Risk Adjustment for Sociodemographic Status in 30-Day Hospital Readmissions and this description of and commentary on the association’s research on the NEJM Catalyst web site.

2016-09-07T06:00:05+00:00September 7th, 2016|Medicare, Uncategorized|Comments Off on Hospital Group Models Risk-Adjusted Medicare Readmissions

Report: Uncompensated Care Payments Insufficiently Aligned With Uncompensated Costs

Some of the payments Medicare makes to hospitals to help them with their uncompensated care costs are not well-aligned with actual hospital uncompensated care costs, the U.S. Government Accountability Office has concluded.
gaoIn a new report based on FY 2013 and FY 2014 data, the GAO found that

Medicare UC [uncompensated care] payments are not well aligned with hospital uncompensated care costs for two reasons. First, payments are largely based on hospitals’ Medicaid workload rather than actual hospital uncompensated care costs…Second, CMS [the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] does not account for hospitals’ Medicaid payments that offset uncompensated care costs when making Medicare UC payments.

Medicare uncompensated payments to hospitals also are sometimes as Medicare disproportionate share (Medicare DSH) uncompensated care payments.
To address this problem, the GAO recommends that CMS

  • improve alignment of Medicare UC payments with hospital uncompensated care costs
  • account for Medicaid payments made when making Medicare UC payments to individual hospitals

The report notes that CMC agreed with these recommendations.
Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals typically receive Medicare uncompensated care payments.
To learn more about what the GAO found and what its implications might be for hospitals, go here for a link to the new GAO report Hospital Uncompensated Care: Federal Action Needed to Better Align Payments with Costs and to a summary of that report.

2016-08-05T06:00:54+00:00August 5th, 2016|Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on Report: Uncompensated Care Payments Insufficiently Aligned With Uncompensated Costs

Report to CMS on Risk Adjustment of Medicare Payments

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has issued its latest report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on how to adjust Medicare payments to hospitals based on the socio-economic risk factors hospitals’ patients pose.
At the request of CMS, the Academies created an expert committee to

…identify criteria for selecting social risk factors, specific social risk fascinators Medicare could use, and methods of accounting for those factors in Medicare quality measurement and payment applications.

The committee created for this purpose viewed its goal to be 

…to guide the selection of social risk factors that could be accounted for in VBP [value-based purchasing] so that providers or health plans are rewarded for delivering quality care and value, independent of whether they serve patients with relatively low or high levels of social risk factors.

academies Now, the committee has issued its third report to CMS, and in that report it offers three overarching considerations and five criteria to determine “whether a social risk factor should be accounted for in performance indicators used in Medicare VBP programs.” They are:

  1. The social risk factor is related to the outcome.
  • The social risk factor has a conceptual relationship with the outcome of interest.
  • The social risk factor has an empirical association with the outcome of interest.
  1. The social risk factor precedes care quality and is not a consequence of the quality of care.
  • The social risk factor is present at the start of care.
  • The social risk factor is not modifiable through provider actions.
  1. The social risk factor is not something the provider can manipulate.
  • The social risk factor is resistant to manipulation or gaming.

Medicare’s readmissions reduction program and other value-based purchasing programs create special challenges for providers like Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals that serve especially large numbers of low-income patients.
To learn more about what the committee proposed and why it proposed it, see this news release describing its work, this summary of its work, and the full report, titled Accounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment Criteria, Factors, and Methods.
 

2016-07-20T06:00:58+00:00July 20th, 2016|Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, Uncategorized|Comments Off on Report to CMS on Risk Adjustment of Medicare Payments

CMS Proposes 2017 Medicare Outpatient Payment Policies

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has revealed how it proposes paying hospitals for Medicare-covered outpatient services in 2017.
Bookshelf with law booksAmong other matters, the 764-page proposed regulation addresses:

  • proposed rate increases for outpatient and ambulatory surgery center services;
  • new site-neutral outpatient payment policies;
  • changes in the value-based purchasing program;
  • changes in hospital outpatient quality reporting requirements;
  • electronic health record policies; and
  • changes in ambulatory surgical center quality reporting requirements.

Interested parties have until September 6 to submit written comments to CMS. The final rule will be published later this year and take effect on January 1, 2017. To learn more about what CMS has proposed for Medicare outpatient payments go here to see a CMS fact sheet and here to see the proposed regulation itself.

2016-07-08T06:00:26+00:00July 8th, 2016|Medicare|Comments Off on CMS Proposes 2017 Medicare Outpatient Payment Policies

CMS Proposes Changes in Terms of Medicare, Medicaid Provider Participation

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has proposed changes in the terms under which hospitals may participate in Medicare and Medicaid.
Among those changes, hospitals must:

  • cmsestablish an infection prevention and control program with qualified leaders
  • establish an antibiotic stewardship program with qualified leaders
  • establish policies prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, general, sexual orientation, age, and disability
  • incorporate readmission and hospital-acquired conditions information into their Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement program
  • improve their medical record-keeping and provide for patient access to those records

Learn more what CMS has proposed and why it has proposed it in this CMS news release and this CMS fact sheet. CMS is accepting comments about the proposed changes until August 15. Find a link to the proposed rule itself here.

2016-06-28T06:00:07+00:00June 28th, 2016|Medicare|Comments Off on CMS Proposes Changes in Terms of Medicare, Medicaid Provider Participation
Go to Top