SNAPShots

SNAPShots

About PA Safety Net Admin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far PA Safety Net Admin has created 1179 blog entries.

340B Program Under the Microscope

Federal officials continue to cast a wary eye on a program that gives discounts on prescription drugs to hospitals that care for large numbers of low-income patients.
The federal 340B Prescription Drug Program requires drug manufacturers to give discounts to eligible providers for the prescriptions they provide patients on an outpatient basis; the hospitals then provide their low-income patients with their prescriptions at a discount or free of charge.  The program has grown a great deal in recent years and now, critics argue that some hospitals that currently receive the discounts should not qualify for them and others are not reinvesting the savings the program generates in care for low-income patients.
Hospitals, meanwhile, note that program savings enable them to fund clinics and otherwise unaffordable programs and services and help them absorb the cost of uncompensated care.
The controversy has drawn congressional interest, and the federal agency that administers the program, the Health Resources and Services Administration, was expected to produce new guidelines governing eligibility and the use of prescription drug discounts.  Those guidelines have been delayed in the wake of a federal court ruling involving orphan drug sales that has called into question the agency’s regulation-issuing authority.
Most Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals participate in the program.
Learn more about the 340B Prescription Drug Program, its growth in recent years, the concerns raised about it amid that growth, and what to expect next in this Kaiser Health News article.

2014-06-25T06:00:32+00:00June 25th, 2014|Uncategorized|Comments Off on 340B Program Under the Microscope

Corbett Administration Announces Healthy PA MCOs

While the federal government has not yet announced whether it will approve the Corbett administration’s “Healthy Pennsylvania” Medicaid expansion plan, the administration continues to plan in anticipation of the proposal’s approval.
In May, the administration published a Request for Applications (RFA) from managed care organization interested in serving the state’s Medicaid expansion population through a private, market-driven approach to Medicaid expansion.
Now, the administration has announced that it has approved nine insurers as potential participants and will begin negotiating with those insurers.
Learn more about this latest action, including the criteria for qualifying to participate and a list of the selected insurers in the nine regions the state has established for Healthy Pennsylvania Medicaid expansion, in this news release from the governor’s office.

2014-06-24T06:00:44+00:00June 24th, 2014|Affordable Care Act, Healthy PA, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on Corbett Administration Announces Healthy PA MCOs

SNAP Speaks Out on PA Budget Issues

In a series of three new position papers, the Safety-Net Association has laid out the case for why Pennsylvania needs to fund its Medicaid program adequately in the state’s upcoming 2015 fiscal year.
The first paper, “Pennsylvania Safety-Net Hospitals:  Economic Engines Driving Pennsylvania Communities,” documents the degree to which safety-net hospitals not only provide significant numbers of jobs but also offer higher wages than other hospitals and other Pennsylvania employers.
Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania logoThe second paper, “The Importance of Preserving Uncompensated Care Payments,” notes that Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals, just 25 percent of the state’s acute-care hospitals, provide nearly 50 percent of the $1 billion worth of uncompensated care hospitals in the state provide every year.  The state helps underwrite some of those costs through Tobacco Uncompensated Care fund payments – proceeds of the national tobacco settlement of 1998 – but that funding is now in jeopardy.
And the third paper, “The Need for Stable and Predictable Funding Amid Increasing Challenges,” outlines the enormous and at times conflicting pressures that government and others are exerting on hospitals and explains that while safety-net hospitals look forward to these challenges, they need stable and predictable Medicaid funding to help them rise to the occasion.
SNAP issues these papers as lawmakers in Pennsylvania struggle with an FY 2014 revenue shortfall of more than $500 million and an anticipated shortfall of another $880 million in the coming 2015 fiscal year.
See SNAP’s three new position papers here.

2014-06-20T06:00:20+00:00June 20th, 2014|Pennsylvania Medicaid policy, Pennsylvania state budget issues, Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania|Comments Off on SNAP Speaks Out on PA Budget Issues

Stop Hurting Hospitals That Serve the Poor, HHS Told

Medicare’s hospital readmissions reduction program is unfairly penalizing hospitals that serve especially large numbers of low-income patients, 34 members of Congress have written in a letter to recently appointed Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator Marilyn Tavenner.
The letter, sponsored by Rep. James Renacci (R-Ohio), notes that while the program has

…incentivized hospitals to reduce readmissions, there are some factors outside of a hospital’s control that make it difficult for the patient to avoid readmission.  The current penalty methodology…has created an unintended consequence for hospitals that service our most vulnerable populations – dual-eligible beneficiaries; low-income seniors, or people with disabilities that are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid.

The letter also notes financial penalties imposed by the program “jeopardizes the viability of hospitals that service our nation’s most vulnerable population” and that H.R. 4188, the Establishing Beneficiary Equity in the Hospital Readmissions Program,

…adjusts the penalty methodology for hospitals servicing larger amounts of dual-eligible beneficiaries and excludes patients with certain extenuating circumstances from the penalty calculations.  Adjusting the penalty to account for certain disparities in patient population can make a big difference to hospitals across the country and the nine million dually-eligible beneficiaries that rely on these hospitals for their critical care needs.

Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals are among those hurt by the program in its current form.
Read the House letter to Secretary Burwell and Administrator Tavenner here.

2014-06-19T06:00:16+00:00June 19th, 2014|Uncategorized|Comments Off on Stop Hurting Hospitals That Serve the Poor, HHS Told

Late Budget for PA?

Pennsylvania’s constitution calls for the state to adopt a budget for the next fiscal year by June 30, the end of its fiscal year, but it is looking more and more as if the legislature and governor will miss that deadline this year.
Although budgets typically come easily when the same party controls the governor’s mansion and both chambers of the General Assembly, the state’s revenue shortfall, a structural deficit that will carry over into next year, and the introduction of additional issues into the budget process appear to be slowing progress toward adopting a spending plan for the state’s 2015 fiscal year.
To reinforce the notion that June 30 may come and go without a budget adopted, state Senate majority leader Dominic Pileggi recently told members of his Republican caucus to put their fourth of July celebration plans on hold because their work for the legislative season may not be done.
At stake for Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals is funding for the state’s Medicaid program.  The budget includes numerous items that may prove tempting for officials to prune in search of money to close the current revenue shortfall.  Most tempting may be millions in Tobacco Uncompensated Care Fund revenue frozen by the Corbett administration last year in response to an arbitrator’s decision to reduce the state’s proceeds from the national tobacco settlement.
Tobacco Uncompensated Care funds help underwrite some of the $1 billion in charity care Pennsylvania’s hospitals provide annually – more than 40 percent of it provided by the 25 percent of acute-care hospitals in the state that are safety-net hospitals.  The Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania (SNAP) is conveying its concern about the possibility of reducing this funding to legislators.
Learn more about the potential delay in adopting a state budget in this PA Politics report and this York Dispatch article.

MedPAC: Keep Paying More For Medicare Primary Care Services

The federal government should continue paying extra for primary care services provided to Medicare patients, Congress has been told by its chief advisor on Medicare payment policy.
According to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), the independent federal agency that advises Congress on Medicare payment matters, Medicare has long undervalued primary care services in comparison to specialty medical care, and in 2010 the Affordable Care Act introduced a ten percent bonus for primary care services provided to seniors through 2015.
With the expiration of that bonus coming in a little more than a year, MedPAC has told Congress it should seek to continue the practice but perhaps by making the additional payment on a per beneficiary basis rather than a per visit basis, to make such an approach part of the broader effort to discourage the volume provision of services and to encourage outcomes-oriented care.
In its June 2014 report to Congress, MedPAC also outlines how such a payment might work.
Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals all care for significant numbers of Medicare patients, including many low-income seniors.
Learn more about MedPAC’s overall recommendations, including this one involving Medicare primary care payments, in this MedPAC fact sheet.  Find the entire MedPAC June 2014 report to Congress here.

2014-06-17T06:00:28+00:00June 17th, 2014|Affordable Care Act|Comments Off on MedPAC: Keep Paying More For Medicare Primary Care Services

Thousands in PA Await Word on Medicaid Eligibility

More than 60,000 Pennsylvanians are waiting to hear from the state about their application for Medicaid benefits.
The 60,000 are among more than 1.7 million people nation-wide who have applied for Medicaid are still waiting for a decision on their eligibility – some for as long as eight months.
More than half of those still waiting are in California while some live in states that, like Pennsylvania, have not expanded their Medicaid programs.
Health Benefits Claim FormThe delays have been attributed to problems transferring data received on the federal health insurance exchange to state governments, state programs overwhelmed with volume, technical problems in the states, and other reasons.
Many of those who still await word on their application for Medicaid benefits undoubtedly live in communities served by the state’s private safety-net hospitals.
Learn more about this problem, what is being done about it, and how it affects access to care in this Kaiser Health News article.

2014-06-10T06:00:52+00:00June 10th, 2014|Affordable Care Act, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on Thousands in PA Await Word on Medicaid Eligibility

Uncompensated Care Down in Medicaid Expansion States

Hospitals in states that chose to take advantage of the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion option are providing less charity care than hospitals in states that have not expanded their Medicaid programs.
So reports the Colorado Hospital Association after its survey of 465 hospitals in 30 states.
According to the survey, hospitals’ proportion of Medicaid patients increased in states that expanded their Medicaid programs and did not increase in states that did not expand their Medicaid program and uncompensated care fell in states that expanded their Medicaid programs but did not in other states.
Addressing the extent of these changes, the survey found that

The changes seen here are not only distinct, but also substantial. The Medicaid proportion of total charges increased over three percentage points to 18.8 percent in 2014 from 15.3 percent in 2013, representing a 29 percent growth in the volume of Medicaid charges. When compared to the first quarter of 2013, there was a 30 percent drop in average charity care per hospital across expansion states, to $1.9 million from $2.8 million. Similarly, total self-pay charges declined 25 percent in expansion states, bringing its proportion of total charges down to 3.1 percent from 4.7 percent. In contrast, the proportion of Medicare volume shows little variation through first quarter 2014.

Pennsylvania has not yet expanded its Medicaid program but is currently negotiating the terms of doing so with the federal government.
Find the complete Colorado Hospital Association report here.

2014-06-06T06:00:25+00:00June 6th, 2014|Affordable Care Act, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on Uncompensated Care Down in Medicaid Expansion States

Members of Congress Urge Delay in Medicare DSH Cuts

Fifty-eight members of the House of Representatives have written to House leadership asking them to delay the continued implementation of Affordable Care Act-mandated Medicare disproportionate share (Medicare DSH) cuts.
The letter, to House Speaker John Boehner and minority leader Nancy Pelosi, notes that

…hospitals that qualify for Medicare DSH are, by definition, the very providers caring for the greatest numbers of low-income and low-income elderly patients.  In recent years, hospitals have incurred $270 billion in Medicare cuts, including reductions in their annual cost-of-living adjustments, penalties through Medicare’s value-based purchasing and readmissions reduction programs, reduced Medicare bad debt reimbursement, and continued cuts from sequestration.  Medicare DSH cuts at this time could jeopardize the health care safety net that our constituents and yours need and deserve.

Medicare DSH payments are vital to most of Pennsylvania’s private safety-net hospitals.
Read the entire congressional letter here.

2014-06-05T06:00:07+00:00June 5th, 2014|Affordable Care Act|Comments Off on Members of Congress Urge Delay in Medicare DSH Cuts

Feds Question PA’s MCO Gross Receipts Tax

The federal government is questioning Pennsylvania’s use of proceeds from its tax on Medicaid managed care organizations to draw down federal Medicaid matching funds.
Federal law permits some use of revenue from health care-related taxes to help finance the state’s share of Medicaid spending, but such taxes must be “broad-based” and a 2009 change in the law narrowed the definition of what constitutes a broad-based tax.
According to an audit performed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General, Pennsylvania’s current tax on HealthChoices managed care organizations (MCOs)

…is impermissible because it is not broad based (the Gross Receipts Tax does not apply to all MCOs) and because it holds the Medicaid MCOs harmless as taxpayers…

According to the inspector general’s report, the state collected $1.76 billion in gross receipts tax revenue from its Medicaid MCOs between FY 2009 and 2011 and drew down federal Medicaid funds to match that revenue.
State officials disagree with the inspector general’s findings and have submitted their opposing arguments to the federal government.
The loss of gross receipts tax revenue would leave an enormous hole in the state’s financing of its share of Medicaid spending and could pose a considerable challenge for the state’s private safety-net hospitals because they serve so many Medicaid patients.
Find the inspector general’s report, including its findings and recommendations and the state’s response to them, here on the web site of the Office of the Inspector General.

2014-06-03T06:00:47+00:00June 3rd, 2014|Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on Feds Question PA’s MCO Gross Receipts Tax
Go to Top