SNAPShots

SNAPShots

About PA Safety Net Admin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far PA Safety Net Admin has created 1179 blog entries.

Hepatitis C Treatment Challenges PA’s Medicaid Program

The cost of treating Medicaid patients who suffer from hepatitis C is posing a challenge to Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program.
As new, more expensive, but more effective hepatitis C drugs reach the market, the state’s costs for treating Medicaid patients with the disease have doubled since 2013.
Meanwhile, the state continues to consider at what point in the progression of their hepatitis C Medicaid patients should be offered the most expensive drugs.
Prescription Medication Spilling From an Open Medicine BottleCurrent guidelines are evolving both in the state and nationally, with medical authorities and federal regulators weighing in with their views. Recently, an advisory committee to the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services offered its own recommendations for criteria for prescribing the most expensive drugs.
Learn more about the issue, the cost of treatment, and current Pennsylvania Medicaid policy on when hepatitis C patients must be offered the most expensive drugs and how that policy might be changing in this Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article.

2016-06-14T11:23:40+00:00June 14th, 2016|Pennsylvania Medicaid policy, Pennsylvania Medical Assistance, Uncategorized|Comments Off on Hepatitis C Treatment Challenges PA’s Medicaid Program

Fewer People Skipping Care for Financial Reasons

Fewer Americans are choosing not to pursue medical care for financial reasons, according to new information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
According to the CDC’s National Health Interview Survey, 4.5 percent of the people surveyed reported not getting medical attention they needed for financial reasons in 2015, down from 6.9 percent in 2009 and 2010.
This suggests that the Affordable Care Act’s changes in providing access to health insurance are making a different in the ability of people to get the care they believe they need.
Happy medical team of doctors togetherPrior to the reform law’s passage, the proportion of people reporting that they chose not to seek care for financial reasons had been rising steadily since 1998.
This is good news for Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, which often must deal with the medical and financial implications of serving especially large numbers of patients who, for financial reasons, have had limited and sporadic contact with the health care system over the years.
To learn more about the survey’s findings see this CQ HealthBeat report presented by the Commonwealth Fund and go here to see the CDC report Early Release of Selected Estimates Based on Data From the 2015 National Health Interview Survey.

2016-06-06T06:00:03+00:00June 6th, 2016|Affordable Care Act, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on Fewer People Skipping Care for Financial Reasons

2015 Financial Performance Mixed for PA Hospitals

Most Pennsylvania acute-care hospitals fared well financially in 2015.
But not all of them.
According to a new report issued by the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council, total acute-care hospital margins fell 0.01 percentage points in 2015 but operating margins rose 1.21 percentage points.
49 of the state’s 170 acute-care hospitals lost money on operations and 46 lost money overall.
phc4Other highlights:

  • uncompensated care fell 8.6 percent
  • inpatient days declined for the eighth straight year
  • outpatient visits rose 2.5 percent
  • 53.7 percent of net patient revenue came from inpatient care

Go here for a news release summarizing PHC4’s finding and go here to see the complete report Financial Analysis 2015: An Annual Report on the Financial Health of Pennsylvania Hospitals, which includes state-wide analyses and performance data on individual hospitals.

2016-06-03T06:00:51+00:00June 3rd, 2016|Uncategorized|Comments Off on 2015 Financial Performance Mixed for PA Hospitals

Homeless Health Care Costs Driven More by Hospital Stays Than ER Visits

Extended hospital stays and not frequent visits to hospital emergency rooms constitute the greatest cost in caring for homeless Medicaid patients, a new analysis has found.
A review of 1100 homeless people served by the Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program found that while repeated visits to the ER do constitute a problem for caregivers, the cost of those visits is dwarfed by costs associated with the same patients spending long periods of time in the hospital.
According to the review, 30 percent of the group’s Medicaid costs were for hospital stays while only four percent were for ER services. The homeless frequently spend more time in the hospital because they are in such poor overall health.
In recent years, providers have focused much of their attention on frequent ER visitors – so-called “frequent flyers” or “super-utilizers” – but the experience of the Boston program suggests that conditions that lead to long periods of hospitalization among the homeless may need more attention as well.
iStock_000015640638XSmallBecause of where they are located, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals serve far more homeless patients than the typical hospital.
For a closer look at the Boston program and what its leaders learned, see this Boston Herald article.

2016-06-01T06:00:44+00:00June 1st, 2016|Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, Uncategorized|Comments Off on Homeless Health Care Costs Driven More by Hospital Stays Than ER Visits

Bill Proposes Modifying Ban on Higher Medicare Outpatient Payments

A new bill introduced in the House Ways and Means Committee would limit a recent prohibition on establishing new off-campus hospital outpatient facilities that can receive hospital-based Medicare outpatient payments.
ways and meansUnder the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, new off-campus, hospital-based outpatient facilities would be paid for Medicare-covered outpatient services like regular physician offices and not like hospital outpatient departments. The Helping Hospitals Improve Patient Care Act of 2016, however, would permit new outpatient departments that were in “mid-build” at the time the 2015 law passed to be exempt from that law’s limits on outpatient payments.
According to a Ways and Means summary of the bill,

Section 201 provides for an exception to section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA’15) for those hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) that were defined as “mid-build” prior to November 2, 2015. “Mid-build” is defined as a provider that had a binding written agreement with an outside, unrelated, party for the actual construction of the HOPD. To qualify as “mid-build,” each HOPD will be required to submit a certification from the provider’s Chief Executive Officer/Chief Operating Officer that the HOPD meets the definition of mid- build prior to July 1, 2016. Further, each mid-build HOPD will be required to submit an attestation that it meets the requirements of being provider-based (42 Code of Federal Regulations 413.65) by July 1, 2016. In addition, the section also requires the Secretary to audit the accuracy of these attestations. HOPDs that meet all of above requirements will receive the full HOPD payment rate beginning January 1, 2018 instead of the lower physician fee schedule or ambulatory surgical center payments required under the BBA’ 15. Finally, those off-campus HOPDs that submitted a voluntary attestation prior to December 2, 2015 will receive the full HOPD payment rate beginning January 1, 2017.

To learn more about this and other provisions of H.R. 5273, the Helping Hospitals Improve Patient Care Act of 2016, go here to see the Ways and Means Committee’s summary of the bill and go here to see the bill itself.

2016-05-26T06:00:30+00:00May 26th, 2016|Medicare|Comments Off on Bill Proposes Modifying Ban on Higher Medicare Outpatient Payments

Help on the Way for Those With Hepatitis C?

Pennsylvanians insured by Medicaid who have Hepatitis C have often found themselves blocked from access to new treatments that can cure the disease.
But that may be changing.
Prescription Medication Spilling From an Open Medicine BottleWhile states’ finances have been groaning under the cost of new budget-busting treatments, a growing trend is to increase access to the costly treatments rather than keep it very limited.
Last week the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee of the state’s Medicaid program voted to ease the state’s current limits on access to treatment that costs between $31,000 and $58,000 a patient. Currently, about 30,000 Pennsylvania Medicaid beneficiaries suffer from Hepatitis C and another 10,000 are thought to be infected but not yet suffering.
The committee’s vote is advisory; the final decision rests with Department of Human Services Secretary Ted Dallas.
Learn more about the state of Hepatitis C treatment in Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program and the changes that may be coming in this Philadelphia Inquirer article.
 

2016-05-25T06:00:28+00:00May 25th, 2016|Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on Help on the Way for Those With Hepatitis C?

New Report Highlights Benefits of 340B Program

A new report describes how the federal government’s 340B Drug Pricing Program works, how it serves low-income participants, what might happen if the program were curtailed, and why the program remains as important as ever despite the declining number of uninsured Americans.
The program, created in the early 1990s, requires pharmaceutical companies to provide outpatient drugs to eligible health care providers at significantly reduced prices. Providers qualify based on the number of low-income and uninsured patients they serve and they must be non-profit organizations.
Most Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals participate in the program.
Prescription Medication Spilling From an Open Medicine BottleAmid a considerable increase in the number of eligible providers, drug companies have been calling on the federal government to scale back the program.
Learn more about the 340B program in the new report “340B Program Helps Hospitals Provide Services to Vulnerable Patients: Results From a Survey of 340B Health Members,” released by the advocacy organization 340B Health. Find the report here.

2016-05-24T06:00:03+00:00May 24th, 2016|Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on New Report Highlights Benefits of 340B Program

Bill Proposes Risk-Adjusting Medicare Readmissions Program

ways and meansA new bill introduced in the House Ways and Means Committee would apply risk adjustment for socio-economic factors to Medicare’s hospital readmissions reduction program.
According to a committee summary of the bill, The Helping Hospitals Improve Patient Care Act of 2016 includes a provision that would direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to

… implement a transitional risk adjustment methodology to serve as a proxy of socio-economic status for the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. In addition to the transitional adjustment, the section clarifies that the Secretary is able to permanently use a more refined methodology following the analysis required by the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014. The section also requires a study by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), and allows for an analysis of “V-codes” and an exploration of potential exclusions.

The bill would be beneficial for Pennsylvania’s private safety-net hospitals because they serve more low-income patients who are more challenging to treat than typical hospital patients and are more likely to require post-discharge readmission to address continuing medical and social issues.
For a closer look at the bill’s socio-economic risk adjustment provision and other proposals, go here to see the committee’s summary of H.R. 5273, The Helping Hospitals Improve Patient Care Act of 2016, and go here to see the bill itself.

2016-05-23T06:00:17+00:00May 23rd, 2016|Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on Bill Proposes Risk-Adjusting Medicare Readmissions Program

Socio-Economic Factors Leading Cause in Pediatric Asthma Readmissions

African-American children suffering from asthma are readmitted to hospitals more often than other children primarily because of socio-economic factors, a new study published in JAMA Pediatrics has concluded.
jama pediatricsIn a study conducted in Cincinnati, according to the report, “Socioeconomic hardship variables explained 53% of the observed disparity” in readmissions among African-American children with asthma. The study also found that

A total of 80% of the observed readmission disparity between African American and white children could be explained after statistically balancing available biologic, environmental, disease management, access to care, and socioeconomic and hardship variables across racial groups.

These findings are especially relevant to Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals because the communities they serve often have especially large numbers of low-income and low-income African-American children.
Read more about the study, its findings, and its implications in the JAMA Pediatrics article “Explaining Racial Disparities in Child Asthma Readmission Using a Causal Inference Approach, “which can be found here.

2016-05-19T06:00:21+00:00May 19th, 2016|Uncategorized|Comments Off on Socio-Economic Factors Leading Cause in Pediatric Asthma Readmissions

Covered by Medicare But Underinsured

Nearly a quarter of the country’s 50 million Medicare beneficiaries are underinsured and ill-equipped financially to handle the program’s cost-sharing responsibilities.
Or so concludes a new report from the Commonwealth Fund.
WheelchairAccording to the report, Medicare’s cost-sharing requirements – premiums, co-pays, deductibles, and services not covered by the program, such as dental and vision care – far outstrip the resources of more than 11 million low-income program participants, leaving many to spend more than 20 percent of their income on health care costs.
In its new report “On Medicare But At Risk: A State-Level Analysis of Beneficiaries Who Are Underinsured or Facing High Total Cost Burdens,” the Commonwealth Fund describes the health care costs Medicare does and does not cover, defines what constitutes “underinsured” and ill-equipped to handle health care costs, delineates the out-of-pocket costs for which beneficiaries are responsible, and offers a state-by-state breakdown of where the uninsured can be found and the proportion of total income they spend on medical services.
Because they serve communities with especially large numbers of low-income residents, Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals care for disproportionate numbers of such underinsured Medicare patients. As a result, they face the prospect of providing significant amounts of uncollectible uncompensated care as a result of Medicare patients who cannot afford their co-pays and deductibles.
Find the Commonwealth Fund report here.

2016-05-16T06:00:34+00:00May 16th, 2016|Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on Covered by Medicare But Underinsured
Go to Top