SNAPShots

SNAPShots

About PA Safety Net Admin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far PA Safety Net Admin has created 1179 blog entries.

SNAP Rallies PA Delegation to Oppose MFAR

A proposed federal Medicaid regulation could limit Pennsylvania’s ability to finance its Medicaid program and jeopardize supplemental payments to the state’s private safety-net hospitals, so SNAP has asked members of the state’s congressional delegation to sign a letter to CMS Administrator Seema Verma asking her to reconsider the potentially damaging Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation.

Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania logoIn its letter to members of the state’s congressional delegation, SNAP wrote on behalf of private Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals that

The proposed Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation (MFAR) would, if implemented, impose new limits on how states may raise their share of funds to support their Medicaid programs. If adopted, the commonwealth would face a serious challenge raising the money it needs to finance its share of the cost of its Medicaid program. In addition, MFAR would take a great deal of states’ Medicaid policy-making authority away from state governments and give it instead to the federal Department of Health and Human Services.

Two members of the state’s congressional delegation, Representatives Brendan Boyle (D-Montgomery/Philadelphia) and Mike Kelly (R-Butler/Crawford/Erie/Lawrence/Mercer), have written a bipartisan letter to be sent to CMS Administrator Seema Verma asking her to reconsider the troubling aspects of MFAR.  SNAP wrote to members of the state’s congressional delegation asking them to sign onto the letter.

Go here to see the full SNAP letter to the delegation.

 

2020-03-03T06:00:10+00:00March 3rd, 2020|Federal Medicaid issues, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy, Uncategorized|Comments Off on SNAP Rallies PA Delegation to Oppose MFAR

Azar: Budget Proposes Reducing Medicaid Matching $

The federal government would reduce its financial commitment to state Medicaid programs under the FY 2021 budget the Trump administration proposed earlier this month.

While testifying before the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar acknowledged that the administration’s proposed FY 2021 would eliminate the enhanced rate at which the federal government matches state funds used to serve individuals who enrolled in Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion provision.  That enhanced rate calls for the federal government to pay 100 percent of the costs associated with the Medicaid population during the first year of Medicaid expansion, eventually scaling down to 90 percent after 2020.  Nationally, the federal government’s matching rate for the pre-expansion population is 57 percent; that matching rate would not be affected by this proposal.

This aspect of the administration’s proposed FY 2021 budget has mostly flown under the radar since the budget’s release and has received little public attention.

In explaining the proposal, Azar said that enhanced funding for the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion population was biased against the disabled, women, and children.

Such a policy change could be a blow to safety-net hospitals in states like Pennsylvania, which added more than a half-million people to its Medicaid program through the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion provision.

Learn more about what Secretary Azar said about federal matching funds for state Medicaid programs in the McKnight’s Long-Term Care News article “Official confirms Trump budget proposed to eliminate enhanced Medicaid match.”

 

2020-02-28T06:00:34+00:00February 28th, 2020|Affordable Care Act, Federal Medicaid issues|Comments Off on Azar: Budget Proposes Reducing Medicaid Matching $

SNAP Rallies PA Delegation to Oppose Proposed Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Regulation (Letter)

SNAP asks members of Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation to sign onto a bipartisan letter written by delegation members Brendan Boyle (D) and Mike Kelly (R) asking the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administration to reconsider a proposed regulation that could limit the state’s ability to finance its share of its Medicaid spending and appropriately reimburse providers of high volumes of Medicaid-covered services.

2020-09-01T17:59:31+00:00February 27th, 2020|Advocacy|Comments Off on SNAP Rallies PA Delegation to Oppose Proposed Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Regulation (Letter)

HealthChoices MCO Seeks to Address Social Determinants of Health

A managed care plan that participates in Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program is slowly dipping its toe into an effort to address the social determinants of health in Philadelphia.

United Healthcare, with 57,000 Medicaid members in the city, has placed six homeless members with multiple health problems into apartments in the city – it plans to add four more – and is spending between $1200 and $1800 a month on rent and wrapround services.  Its theory:  with one percent of the population accounting for 22 percent of annual health care spending nation-wide, helping some of that one percent could improve lives while saving a great deal of money.

Pennsylvania’s Department of Human Services has awarded nearly $9 million in grants since 2016 to groups attempting to address the social determinants of health and to help the more than 300,000 Medicaid participants in north Philadelphia.

Learn more about what United Healthcare is doing and why it is doing it in the Philadelphia Inquirer article “United Healthcare tackles homelessness as a root cause of poor health, and Philly is a test case.”

2020-02-25T06:00:04+00:00February 25th, 2020|Pennsylvania Medicaid, social determinants of health|Comments Off on HealthChoices MCO Seeks to Address Social Determinants of Health

Fitch: Medicaid Block Grants, MFAR Threaten States, Providers

Medicaid block grants and the proposed Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation (MFAR) pose new financial threats to providers and states, according to Fitch Ratings, the financial rating company.

MFAR poses the greater threat, Fitch believes, noting in a new analysis that it could

…reduce total Medicaid spending nationally by $37 billion and $44 billion annually…and by $23 billion to $30 billion for hospitals alone.  States, and to some extent providers, would respond to MFAR’s implementation with measures to mitigate the negative fiscal implications.

Bookshelf with law booksBlock grants, through what has been named the Healthy Adult Opportunity program, also pose a threat, with Fitch explaining that

Capping federal Medicaid contributions, even for a subset of beneficiaries, poses risks to state budgets and those entities reliant on state funding, including local governments and providers.  States would need to find revenue or cost savings, either in Medicaid or elsewhere, to offset reduced federal contributions.

Because Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals care for more Medicaid patients than the typical hospital, both proposed policy changes have a potentially greater impact on them.

Last month SNAP conveyed its opposition to the proposed MFAR regulation in a formal comment letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in response to the regulation’s publication late last year.  Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf has already rejected the idea of using block grants in the state’s Medicaid program.

Learn more about the potential impact of the proposed Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation and Medicaid block grants in the Fitch Ratings analysis “Fitch Rtgs: Medicaid Changes Will Affect States, NFP Healthcare Providers.”

2020-02-20T06:00:08+00:00February 20th, 2020|Federal Medicaid issues, Pennsylvania Medicaid, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania|Comments Off on Fitch: Medicaid Block Grants, MFAR Threaten States, Providers

PA Seeks to Connect Medicaid Beneficiaries With Job

Pennsylvania has launched a new program that seeks to help Medicaid beneficiaries who would like to find jobs.

The program, called Medicaid Work Supports, is a joint project of the state’s Department of Human Services and Department of Labor & Industry.

As described in The Impact, DHS’s weekly newsletter:

The Medicaid Work Supports initiative will create a more direct and systematic introduction to employment and training resources available to Pennsylvanians. When people are deemed eligible and enroll in a new Medicaid health plan, they will be asked if they are interested in help finding a job, training programs, and opportunities to get a high school diploma or GED. The referral system will help identify this population for the first time and create the opportunity for a meaningful, encouraging partnership between the MCOs, the PA CareerLink® system, and the enrollee to facilitate connections to employment and success in the workforce.

Individuals interested in learning more about these services will receive outreach either through PA CareerLinks®, their selected health plan, or their local county assistance office to provide awareness of and referrals to resources and programs available in their local community.

Learn more about Medicaid Work Supports in the February 14, 2020 edition of The Impact, DHS’s weekly newsletter.

2020-02-18T06:00:22+00:00February 18th, 2020|Uncategorized|Comments Off on PA Seeks to Connect Medicaid Beneficiaries With Job

Verma Responds to MFAR Critics

CMS administrator Seema Verma addresses criticism of her agency’s proposed Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation in a new commentary on the CMS blog.

Critics of the so-called MFAR regulation have argued that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ proposed regulation, if adopted, will lead to a reduction of federal funding for state Medicaid programs, jeopardize access to care and the financial health of providers by leading to a reduction of supplemental payments to high-volume Medicaid providers, and possibly even force some states to raise taxes to compensate for the loss of federal funding.

In her commentary Verma rebuts these criticisms, maintaining that the proposed regulation seeks to ensure that states pay their fair share of their Medicaid partnership with the federal government, raise that share in a manner consistent with federal guidelines, and spend it in ways that fall within regulatory standards.  She also maintains that the regulation will foster greater transparency and accountability for the Medicaid program.

Verma notes that more than 4000 stakeholders submitted written comments in response to the proposed regulation.  SNAP was among those commenters, writing that MFAR would give too much authority to federal regulators; create new administrative burdens for hospitals and state governments; and inappropriately limit state financing of their share of Medicaid spending.

Learn more from the Verma CMS blog commentary “Medicaid Fiscal Integrity: Protecting Taxpayers and Patients” and from SNAP’s letter in response to the proposed regulation.

 

2020-02-14T06:00:39+00:00February 14th, 2020|Federal Medicaid issues, Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania|Comments Off on Verma Responds to MFAR Critics

340B Déjà Vu: CMS Seeks to Collect Data From Hospitals

For the second time in four months, the federal government has announced its intention to collect data from hospitals and other providers on what they pay for the prescription drugs they purchase through the section 340B prescription drug discount program.

Last week the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services published a notice announcing its intention to collect this data.  Previously, health care interests sued CMS when it attempted in 2018 to reduce payments to providers for drugs purchased through the 340B program and the court ruled against CMS, maintaining that the agency did not have enough data on hospitals’ acquisition costs for the drugs to justify the proposed payment reduction.  The newly announced data collection effort seeks to rectify that shortcoming as the court considers CMS’s appeal of a similar decision in a lawsuit filed after CMS again proposed reducing 340B payments and was again rebuffed by the courts in 2019.

Under federal law, CMS must publish a notice declaring its intention to collect such data and seek input from stakeholders.  For this particular notice, stakeholders have until March 9 to respond.

CMS published a similar notice in September of 2019 announcing its intention to collect similar data.  That data collection never took place.

Most Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals participate in the 340B program and consider it a vital tool in serving the many low-income residents of the communities in which they are located.

To learn more about CMS’s 340B data collection effort, see the notice it published in the Federal Register and read the Becker’s Hospital Review article “CMS ready to survey 340B hospitals about drug acquisition costs.”

2020-02-13T06:00:33+00:00February 13th, 2020|340b, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on 340B Déjà Vu: CMS Seeks to Collect Data From Hospitals

Verma Responds to Medicaid Block Grant Critics

Last week the Trump administration unveiled its Healthy Adult Opportunity program, a new, optional, already-controversial approach to structuring state Medicaid programs.

Ever since, the program – essentially, Medicaid block grants – has been the subject of criticism from many public officials and health care stakeholders.

Now, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrator Seema Verma, who oversaw the development of Healthy Adult Opportunity, has responded to the program’s critics in an op-ed piece published in the Washington Post.  See her commentary “No, the Trump administration is not cutting Medicaid.

2020-02-12T06:00:12+00:00February 12th, 2020|Federal Medicaid issues|Comments Off on Verma Responds to Medicaid Block Grant Critics

Health Care Groups Rebel Against Proposed Federal Regulation, Program

The administration’s proposed Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation and its guidance encouraging states to implement Medicaid block grants have incurred widespread opposition among a variety of health care groups.

The Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation would, if adopted, impose new restrictions on how states raise their share of their Medicaid spending, potentially limiting state participation in Medicaid or necessitating tax increases to fill the funding gap if long-accepted financing tools are no longer available to them.

Bookshelf with law booksThe Medicaid block grant guidance offers states a blueprint for curtailing their Medicaid costs by imposing limits on that spending that they negotiate with the federal government.

Numerous health care groups have expressed reservations or direct opposition to one or both of the proposals.  Among them:

  • AARP
  • America’s Essential Hospitals
  • America’s Health Insurance Plans
  • American College of Emergency Physicians
  • American Health Care Association
  • American Hospital Association
  • American Medical Association
  • Association for Community Affiliated Plans
  • Association of American Medical Colleges
  • Coalition of Long-Term Acute-Care Hospitals
  • LeadingAge
  • National Alliance of Safety-Net Hospitals
  • National Association of State Budget Officers
  • National Association of Medicaid Directors
  • National Continuing Care Residents Association
  • National Governors Association
  • Private Essential Access Community Hospitals

Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania logoAmong the groups submitting formal comment letters to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in response to the proposed Medicaid fiscal accountability regulation was the Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania.  See SNAP’s letter here.

Learn more about why these groups object to these two new policy developments in articles in Axios (“A little-noticed Medicaid proposal could have huge consequences”), Bloomberg Law (“Trump Plan to Tame State Medicaid Finance Schemes Sees Pushback”), Health Affairs (“Proposed Rules On Medicaid Financing Miss Mark And Threaten Access”), Healthcare Dive (“Payers, providers urge CMS to scrap rule targeting supplemental Medicaid payments”), Healthcare Finance News (“Providers, payers, others speak out against federal proposals for Medicaid funding”), McKnight’s Long-Term Care News (“Providers rally against proposed Medicaid supplemental payment rules that threaten ‘major financial burdens’”), McKnight’s Senior Living (“CMS proposal would be ‘major financial burden’ for CCRCs, residents, organizations say”),  and U.S. News & World Report (“Governors Warn Trump Rule Could Lead to Big Medicaid Cuts”)

2020-02-10T06:00:34+00:00February 10th, 2020|Federal Medicaid issues, Safety-Net Association of Pennsylvania|Comments Off on Health Care Groups Rebel Against Proposed Federal Regulation, Program
Go to Top