SNAPShots

SNAPShots

Serving High-Risk Patients Leads to VPB Penalties

Practices that served more socially high-risk patients had lower quality and lower costs, and practices that served more medically high-risk patients had lower quality and higher costs. These patterns were associated with fewer bonuses and more penalties for high-risk practices.

So concludes a new study that looked at the results of the first year of the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program.
The study looked at 899 physician practices serving more than five million Medicare beneficiaries, and it points to the continuing challenge of how best to serve patients who pose greater socio-economic risks than the average patient.
Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals serve far more high-risk patients than the typical hospital.
Learn more these findings and how they were reached in the study “Association of Practice-Level Social and Medical Risk With Performance in the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program,” which can be found here, on the web site of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

2017-08-03T09:13:01+00:00August 3rd, 2017|Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals|Comments Off on Serving High-Risk Patients Leads to VPB Penalties

Report to CMS on Risk Adjustment of Medicare Payments

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has issued its latest report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on how to adjust Medicare payments to hospitals based on the socio-economic risk factors hospitals’ patients pose.
At the request of CMS, the Academies created an expert committee to

…identify criteria for selecting social risk factors, specific social risk fascinators Medicare could use, and methods of accounting for those factors in Medicare quality measurement and payment applications.

The committee created for this purpose viewed its goal to be 

…to guide the selection of social risk factors that could be accounted for in VBP [value-based purchasing] so that providers or health plans are rewarded for delivering quality care and value, independent of whether they serve patients with relatively low or high levels of social risk factors.

academies Now, the committee has issued its third report to CMS, and in that report it offers three overarching considerations and five criteria to determine “whether a social risk factor should be accounted for in performance indicators used in Medicare VBP programs.” They are:

  1. The social risk factor is related to the outcome.
  • The social risk factor has a conceptual relationship with the outcome of interest.
  • The social risk factor has an empirical association with the outcome of interest.
  1. The social risk factor precedes care quality and is not a consequence of the quality of care.
  • The social risk factor is present at the start of care.
  • The social risk factor is not modifiable through provider actions.
  1. The social risk factor is not something the provider can manipulate.
  • The social risk factor is resistant to manipulation or gaming.

Medicare’s readmissions reduction program and other value-based purchasing programs create special challenges for providers like Pennsylvania’s safety-net hospitals that serve especially large numbers of low-income patients.
To learn more about what the committee proposed and why it proposed it, see this news release describing its work, this summary of its work, and the full report, titled Accounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment Criteria, Factors, and Methods.
 

2016-07-20T06:00:58+00:00July 20th, 2016|Medicare, Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals, Uncategorized|Comments Off on Report to CMS on Risk Adjustment of Medicare Payments
Go to Top