SNAPShots

SNAPShots

About PA Safety Net Admin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far PA Safety Net Admin has created 1187 blog entries.

PA Medicaid Expansion Approved by Feds

Pennsylvania’s request for federal approval of its Medicaid expansion plan has been approved by the federal government.
The plan, part of the Corbett administration’s “Healthy Pennsylvania” health care reform proposal, calls for an expanded population of Pennsylvanians who are newly eligible for Medicaid to obtain subsidized coverage through the private health insurance market – managed care organizations approved by the state to serve the new Medicaid expansion population.
The letter of approval from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator Marilyn Tavenner to Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Secretary Beverly Mackereth notes that

…the state aims to modify Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program and expand access to coverage to adults in Pennsylvania with incomes through 133 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) beginning January 1, 2015.

The terms of the demonstration have been incorporated into the accompanying Special Terms and Conditions (STCs) and waiver authorities for the demonstration approval. The approved demonstration authorizes the state to charge premiums to newly eligible individuals up to 133 percent of FPL with access to health care coverage through managed care health plans. Specifically, beginning in January 2016 of the demonstration, the state may charge monthly premiums in an amount not to exceed 2 percent of household income for certain adults with incomes above 100 percent of the FPL.

Beneficiaries subject to a premium as authorized by the demonstration will not be charged copayments (with the exception of an $8 copayment for non- emergency use of the emergency room, which the state may authorize within the Medicaid state plan). Individuals failing to pay the monthly premiums for three consecutive months may be disenrolled from coverage, and may re-enroll without a waiting period. The Commonwealth is not imposing premiums on individuals with incomes at or below 100 percent of the FPL.

The Healthy Pennsylvania demonstration includes an incentive program that is intended to improve the use of preventive services and other healthy behaviors. Enrollees who complete specified healthy behaviors during the first year of enrollment in the demonstration shall have their premium obligations reduced in their second year. For each subsequent year, enrollees will have the opportunity to complete healthy behaviors to reduce their amount of financial obligations.

We have provided authority for the state to not offer non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) during the first year of the demonstration. This authority will sunset on December 31,2015, and the state will provide NEMT to these beneficiaries beginning in year 2 of the demonstration. The changes in the Pennsylvania demonstration are consistent with those in other demonstrations.

The Commonwealth will deliver services to the newly eligible population through contracts with managed care organizations. Individuals covered will have the choice of an approved health plan in their region. Medicaid managed care rules continue to apply under the demonstration although as stipulated in the demonstration the Commonwealth may rely on state or federal commercial standards when those standards are at least as robust as the Medicaid standards.

Benefits provided to individuals eligible under the expansion will be consistent with federal statutory requirements effectuated through amendments to the Commonwealth’s state plan, rather than the approved demonstration. The expansion population, including those who are subject to this demonstration and those who are medically frail and covered outside of this demonstration, will receive the full complement of health services required under the law. Medically frail individuals will receive coverage from the state through a “high risk” benefit plan.

CMS and the state have been in active consultation on the state plan amendments needed to effectuate this change and have reached agreement on the overall benefits approach, pending final submission of documents by the state consistent with the agreement that has been reached.

In addition, outside this demonstration, the state aims to encourage employment through incentives for job training and work-related activities, including access to Healthy Pennsylvania Career Coaches, for Healthy Pennsylvania beneficiaries who choose to participate in the state’s Encouraging Employment program. Health coverage provided by the Medicaid program and this demonstration will not be affected by this state initiative.

The complete approval letter and a second document describing the special terms and conditions the federal government has attached to the waiver approval can be found here, on the Healthy Pennsylvania web site.

2014-08-29T06:00:52+00:00August 29th, 2014|Affordable Care Act, Health care reform, Healthy PA, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on PA Medicaid Expansion Approved by Feds

Charity Care? Wait a Minute

Many hospitals are considering whether they should continue to provide charity care to people who were eligible for Affordable Care Act subsidies to purchase health insurance but chose instead to remain uninsured.
The issue for many is whether the availability of charity care is an inducement for some people not to purchase health insurance and whether such patients are unwilling or unable to pay for care.
Some hospitals have decided not to provide non-emergency charity care to those who chose not to purchase subsidized health insurance.  Others are currently considering whether they need to revise their approach to charity care.  Still others have decided that they will not change their charity care policies.
HospitalCharity care is an especially critical issue for the state’s safety-net hospitals because they serve so many more low-income and uninsured patients than the typical Pennsylvania hospital.
Learn more about this latest phase in the evolution of charity care and how hospitals are approaching it in this Kaiser Health News report.

2014-08-28T06:00:40+00:00August 28th, 2014|Affordable Care Act|Comments Off on Charity Care? Wait a Minute

PA Introduces New ER Pain Treatment Guidelines

The Pennsylvania Department of Health and Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs have released new guidelines for the treatment of pain in hospital emergency rooms.
The guidelines, proposed by the Safe and Effective Prescribing Practices and Pain Management Task Force, were developed by the Pennsylvania College of Emergency Physicians and presented by a task force that included representatives of government, health care professions, and associations.
See a state news release about the guidelines here and download the guidelines themselves here.

2014-08-27T06:00:47+00:00August 27th, 2014|Uncategorized|Comments Off on PA Introduces New ER Pain Treatment Guidelines

Clock Ticking for 12,600 Newly Insured Pennsylvanians

12,600 Pennsylvanians newly insured through the Affordable Care Act will lose their health insurance at the end of September if they cannot prove their eligibility for that insurance.
Most of these cases involve questions about whether the newly insured are living in the U.S. legally.
Health Benefits Claim FormThese 12,600 Pennsylvanians are among approximately 300 ,000 people nation-wide whose eligibility for insurance and insurance subsidies is currently under review by the federal government and who have not yet responded to requests for information about citizenship, immigration status, or income.
The affected people have until September 5 to provide the requested information.  Those who fail to do so, and those who do not meet the requirements, will lose their health insurance as of September 30.
Learn more about this situation in this Pittsburgh Business Times article.

2014-08-26T09:58:21+00:00August 26th, 2014|Uncategorized|Comments Off on Clock Ticking for 12,600 Newly Insured Pennsylvanians

Readmissions and Quality: Are They Related?

A new study casts doubt on a major principle underlying a good deal of recent federal health care policy.
That principle holds that hospitals that have lower rates of 30-day readmissions of Medicare patients provide better, more economical care than those with higher readmission rates.
But that may not be true.
Hospital buildingAccording to an examination of the performance of safety-net hospitals in California published in the journal Health Affairs, those safety-net hospitals are more likely than others to be penalized by Medicare’s hospital readmissions reduction and value-based purchasing programs.
At the same time, however, these same hospitals had lower 30-day, risk-adjusted mortality rates for patients treated for myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia.  The safety-net hospitals also had marginally lower adjusted Medicare costs.
Find out more about the findings of the study “California Safety-Net Hospitals Likely to be Penalized by ACA Value, Readmission, and Meaningful-Use Programs,” which can be found here, on the web site of the journal Health Affairs.
 

2014-08-21T06:00:31+00:00August 21st, 2014|Affordable Care Act, Health care reform|Comments Off on Readmissions and Quality: Are They Related?

New Pennsylvania Health Law Project Newsletter

The Pennsylvania Health Law Project has published its latest newsletter.
Among the articles are stories about the preservation of the state’s Medical Assistance for Workers with Disabilities Program (MAWD); new funding for home- and community-based services for people with disabilities; a clarification of Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) benefits; and more.
Find the newsletter here.

2014-08-18T06:00:24+00:00August 18th, 2014|Pennsylvania Medicaid laws and regulations, Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on New Pennsylvania Health Law Project Newsletter

Translating Insurance Into Care

While the Affordable Care Act is enabling millions of Americans to obtain health insurance – many of them for the first time – many of the newly insured do not understand how their insurance works or how to use it to get the care they need.
Across the country, advocacy groups, insurers, hospitals, and clinics are encountering newly insured people struggling to translate their new health insurance into health care, and many are employing outreach and educational programs to teach people how to enjoy the benefits of their new coverage.
Doctor listening to patientLearn more about the new challenges health care providers are encountering, and about how a group of organizations in Philadelphia is responding to that challenge, in this New York Times article.

2014-08-14T06:00:44+00:00August 14th, 2014|Affordable Care Act|Comments Off on Translating Insurance Into Care

PA Aging Waiver Program Struggles With Backlog

A Pennsylvania program to help the elderly remain in their own homes instead of moving into nursing homes is struggling with backlogs.
The state’s Aging Waiver Program is a Medicaid program that enables those who meet certain medical and financial criteria to receive assistance in their own homes from nurses and home health aides rather than go into a nursing home.
Group of healthcare workersCurrently the program serves more than 32,000 people – nearly twice as many as it did six years ago – but applications are taking as long as two months to process.  The biggest challenge is verifying financial eligibility, but the state recently added staff to help address the backlog.
Learn more about Pennsylvania’s Aging Waiver Program in this Pittsburgh Tribune-Review article.

2014-08-11T06:00:49+00:00August 11th, 2014|Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on PA Aging Waiver Program Struggles With Backlog

IOM Releases Graduate Medical Education Report

‘’…there is an unquestionable imperative to assess and optimize the effectiveness of the public’s investment in GME (graduate medical education).”
So says the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in its new report Graduate Medical Education That Meets the Nation’s Health Needs.
The IOM also calls for “significant changes to GME financing and governance to address current deficiencies and better shape the physician workforce for the future.”
The report notes that government today, mostly through Medicare, plays the primary role in financing graduate medical education.  It observes that while there is a common perception that the nation faces a shortage of physicians, simply increasing the number of residency slots that Medicare supports – a limit set in 1997 – without addressing geographic and specialty distribution issues will not solve the problem.
In the report, the IOM proposes six goals for improving GME financing.

  1. Encourage production of a physician workforce better prepared to work in, help lead, and continually improve an evolving health care delivery system that can provide better individual care, better population health, and lower cost.

  2. Encourage innovation in the structures, locations, and designs of GME programs to better achieve Goal 1.

  3. Provide transparency and accountability of GME programs, with respect to the stewardship of public funding and the achievement of GME goals.

  4. Clarify and strengthen public policy planning and oversight of GME with respect to the use of public funds and the achievement of goals for the investment of those funds.

  5. Ensure rational, efficient, and effective use of public funds for GME in order to maximize the value of this public investment.

  6. Mitigate unwanted and unintended negative effects of planned transitions in GME funding methods.

To fulfill these goals, the report offers three specific recommendations:

  1. Investing strategically: Maintain Medicare GME funding at its current level, but modernize payment methods to reward performance, ensure accountability, and incentivize innovation in the content and financing of GME. The current Medicare GME payment system should be phased out.

  2. Building an infrastructure to facilitate strategic investment: Establish a two-part governance infrastructure for federal GME financing. A GME Policy Council in the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services should oversee policy development and decision making. A GME Center within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should function as an operations center with the capacity to administer payment reforms and manage demonstrations of new payment models.

  3. Establishing a two-part Medicare GME fund: Allocate Medicare GME funds to two distinct subsidiary funds—a GME Operational Fund to finance ongoing residency training activities and a Transformation Fund to finance development of new programs, infrastructure, performance methods, payment demonstrations, and other priorities identified by the GME Policy Council.

Graduate medical education is an important issue for the Pennsylvania safety-net hospitals that also are teaching hospitals.  The state’s Medicaid program is an important source of medical education funding for these hospitals as well.
To learn more about why the study was undertaken, what problems it sought to address, what the IOM learned, and what it proposed, follow this link to the IOM’s web site and the complete report as well as a report summary.

2014-08-01T06:00:22+00:00August 1st, 2014|Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on IOM Releases Graduate Medical Education Report

GAO Questions State Medicaid Financing

States are now financing more than a quarter of their share of Medicaid expenditures with money from sources other than state general funds, according to a new study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
According to the GAO, 26 percent of state share of Medicaid funding comes from taxes on health care providers, transfers from local governments and local government providers, and other sources.  Such funding, the GAO noted, shifts additional Medicaid costs to the federal government.
Pennsylvania uses such funding mechanisms, including its gross receipts tax on Medicaid managed care organizations and state-wide and Philadelphia hospital assessments.
Exacerbating this problem, the GAO reports, is that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which oversees Medicaid, does not assure that it receives complete and accurate data on funding sources from the states, leaving CMS without a complete understanding of how states are financing their Medicaid expenditures.  In the report, the GAO recommends a stronger CMS effort to gather such data – a recommendation that CMS did not accept.
Learn more about the GAO study “States Increased Reliance on Funds From Health Care Providers and Local Governments Warrants Improved CMS Data Collection” by finding the complete report and a summary here, on the GAO web site.

2014-07-31T06:00:42+00:00July 31st, 2014|Pennsylvania Medicaid policy|Comments Off on GAO Questions State Medicaid Financing
Go to Top